Talk:AK-107

Designer: Mikhail Kalashnikov?

I know it's a descendant of his AK-47 design, but was Kalashnikov personally involved in designing this rifle? — Red XIV ^(talk) 16:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Might not be, but there's a good chance he was. I mean, he still designs weapons for Russia yes? So it wouldn't be hard for him to modify his design repeatedly. Still, we may never receive confirmation of who did it, as if it was a new designer, Russia might try to keep him secret. They would probably keep it quiet no matter who did it.Rynky (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

No, it was another Izhmash engineer, Alexandrov, who had been working on the BARS system since the 1970s. AK in AK-107 is derived from Alexandrov/Kalashnikov, basically meaning that Alexandrov's BARS operating system was incorporated into the AK-pattern rifle. Koalorka (talk) 04:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

AK-109

How come the 7.62x39mm AK-109 is not listed on the page? - 212.108.204.4 (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AK-107. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091228090820/http://izhevsk.club.guns.ru:80/eng/ak107.html to http://izhevsk.club.guns.ru/eng/ak107.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121222065142/http://www.izhmash.ru:80/eng/product/ak108.shtml to http://www.izhmash.ru/eng/product/ak108.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Redundancy?

Isn't it kind of redundant to have a whole "Users" category when only Russia uses it and when there's a "Users" category in the infobox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:318F:4750:8595:3DF5:4368:C752 (talk) 22:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• AK-107.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Bad physics / propagated rumors

The balanced recoil system does not reduce recoil. That is physically impossible with a projectile leaving the muzzle. This claim is common among firearms using this system, but physically debunkable. A perfectly-balanced autoloading bolt will in fact increase felt recoil (or more accurately, sharpen the impulse curve) to that of a bolt-action rifle.

It is not clear if these claims sprouted from AEK marketing -- which is harder to reject on wikipedia because it comes from an official source -- or from somewhere else. Furthermore, scarcity of these firearms makes debunking the claims through testing difficult. There are other claims made of the balanced recoil system which are not disprovable:

• Increase cyclic rate
• Decrease out-of-line forces on barrel, potentially increasing accuracy.
• Reduce bolt weight / travel

The recoil claim is pervasive, and there should some editor consensus before yanking all of it out of the article. ExtremeSquared (talk) 20:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)