Wikipedia

Talk:ABA Journal

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Retaliation Edits

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Retaliation_by_Epeefleche_and_Stesmo This page has been targeted by users Epeefleche and Stesmo for retaliation after Law School Transparency was deemed a non-reliable source. They have attacked Brian Leiter's wikipedia page and the wikipedia pages of the University of Chicago, Philosophical Gourmet, The American Bar Association and Kirkland & Ellis: https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Philosophical_Gourmet_Report&type=revision&diff=663725919&oldid=642947761 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Brian_Leiter&type=revision&diff=663826565&oldid=663635214 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Philosophical_Gourmet_Report&type=revision&diff=663712714&oldid=642947761 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=ABA_Journal&type=revision&diff=663728099&oldid=643625305 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Kirkland_%26_Ellis&type=revision&diff=663728236&oldid=652907416 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Brian_Leiter&type=revision&diff=663725721&oldid=663714656 https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=University_of_Chicago&type=revision&diff=663727449&oldid=662822725 This is a violation of Wikipedia's policies against retaliation. https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_repeated_arguments https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Sour_grapes https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility Unemployed Northeastern (talk) 19:56, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Unemployed -- it is unethical of you, if you did this knowingly, to accuse me of editing a page that I did not edit. Which is obviously the case here. We assume good faith, but that it is a rebutable presumption. You are actively continuing to rebut it. Please do not, as you did above, spread blatant falsehoods. It is unethical if done knowingly, and negligent in the extreme if done unknowingly. Please edit ethically and with due care. (As to the removal of the ELs, they are in accord with the EL guidelines). Epeefleche (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Furthermore, as indicated here, there is not -- as you assert -- any such consensus. For you to assert otherwise is again either unethical, or grossly negligent. Since it accompanies the above grave mis-statement, my concern about your editing and your "good faith" increases. Epeefleche (talk) 21:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on ABA Journal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:ABA_Journal&oldid=1197136194"