Talk:AACS encryption key controversy

Good articleAACS encryption key controversy has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 3, 2007Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
May 20, 2007Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
August 31, 2007Good article nomineeListed
April 2, 2011Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
Current status: Good article

Outdated?

edit

Based on the fact that everything in this article is several years old, yet the articles speaks as if the issue is unresolved, I feel justified in tagging this with an "out of date" tag. 2600:1015:B12D:92A6:C9C:92FF:5A72:BDA3 (talk) 06:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I suspect that the issue is STILL technically not resolved, but I agree with the "update" tag: finding some more recent link confirming it would be beneficial. -- Hkmaly (talk) 02:38, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

"13256278887989457651018865901401704640" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 13256278887989457651018865901401704640. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#13256278887989457651018865901401704640 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. O.N.R. (talk) 10:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply