Talk:A30 road

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dorset Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Wiltshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Old route turned into a cycle lane?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Most certainly not, at least not the infamous section with the iron bridge - I was on holiday in Cornwall last week and became lost on the old road looking for a backstreets route to the Eden Project! It is most definitely still open, though downgraded to a very high standard B or unclassified route (unsure - part of the reason for getting lost was that the works were not entirely complete and not all the signs had been updated/installed... particularly where the B3275 crosses, they appear to be 20+ years old... also, the signposted route sends you right back the way you came, if you were travelling north, which stuffs up any attempt to navigate without dragging out the compass/satnav!).

It now forms a connecting route to unclassified routes to Belowda (via an impressive bridge over the bypass) and St Dennis, as far as we could tell. There are what are presumably cycle lanes down each side of the roadway (different colour tarmac and dashed white lines, but no symbols or signs) but it is open to motor traffic and moderately busy, certainly enough for a couple of turning manoeuvres to hold us up for a minute or two.

There are also some ENORMOUS height warning signs either side of the bridge, twenty yards or so away from it, on both sides of the road, with permanently lit flashing orange lights. Presumably it is thought there will still be some HGV traffic, and putting in very obvious warnings would be more effective than digging out the road by another couple of feet and all the associated drainage issues. (The road is still NSL but I doubt a trucker would have trouble pulling up from 70 in the wet, let alone 40, given the distance they are visible from).

PS, just who was responsible for the planning and draughtsmanship, re - many of the reasonably major junctions and sliproads? We joined the road at Indian Queens (from the B3274 initially) and... oh... my... God. You're basically spat out onto a 3-lane 70mph motorway, with no hard shoulder and an acceleration lane of two or three car lengths (or one lorry-length), added to which it's at the lower end of an 8% or so gradient, which seemed to halve the car's acceleration (even at full throttle and very high revs) and take a sizable bite out of the top speed (65mph in third, anyone, for a 1600cc?). Luck was with us because traffic was light and I had my wits about me. The exit's just as bad (same deceleration lane length and curve radius) Someone needs slain for that, fingers crossed no accidents will result. Problem is that, though it may be one of the worse examples, it's far from on it's own. Might be more understandable if t'were a farm access, but this is a relatively major junction, and there's no hint given that a FAR easier entry/exit point for all directions exists with the A39 interchange a half mile further north.

Tahrey 82.46.180.56 22:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A30 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120810121037/http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/3505.aspx to http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/3505.aspx

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:59, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Goss Moor (excessive unsourced POV piece moved here for inspection)

In Cornwall the A30 previously crossed Goss Moor along a single carriageway section of the road between Victoria and Indian Queens. This was a major bottleneck in the county's transport system until 2007. An iron railway bridge is also situated in the middle of this section in which the Par–Newquay branch line crosses. This was built a long time before the road was dualled at both ends, and so can only fit a single carriage way beneath it. Due to its height (14 ft 3 in), many lorries in previous years had crashed into it, blocking the whole road completely.

There were plans to restore the rest of the St Austell – Indian Queens freight line (currently only going as far up as St Dennis), and direct rail traffic that way, but this plan was dropped. The road had been subject to a long-running campaign for expansion. As Goss Moor is a national nature reserve,^[1] it is one of the most highly protected wildlife sites in the UK, and plans for expansion were strongly opposed.^[2] In late 2004 a decision was finally reached, and a new dual carriageway now runs around the moor with the existing road converted to a cycle lane.^[3] The first 4-mile (6.4 km) section of the new dual carriageway between Highgate Hill and the new Victoria Interchange opened at midnight on 9/10 May 2007. The former bottleneck of the iron bridge having now been eliminated means that problems with HGV lorries being stuck under the bridge should be a thing of the past. The remaining 3-mile (4.8 km) stretch of new dual carriageway between Victoria Interchange and Innis Downs roundabout opened on 25 June 2007.

The new dual carriageway means that average travel times along this section of the route have reduced significantly. Several petrol stations along the old route have now closed down, and the former route across Goss Moor is now silent once more. The remains of a Stone Age settlement were discovered along the new route during construction.^[4]

References

^ "Natural England". english-nature.org.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 25 May 2007. Retrieved 23 May 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
^ Cite error: The named reference Ref_2004 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ "Stone age discovery in roadworks". BBC News. 6 September 2005. Retrieved 23 April 2010.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on A30 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090605013655/http://highways.gov.uk:80/aboutus/1654.aspx to http://www.highways.gov.uk/aboutus/1654.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.veoh.com/list/morelike/v150743042ZkNpky6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on A30 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110921000339/http://www.highways.gov.uk/aboutus/18780.aspx to http://www.highways.gov.uk/aboutus/18780.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120408211459/http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/3505.aspx to http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/3505.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.highways.gov.uk/aboutus/1654.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.veoh.com/browse/morelike/v150743042ZkNpky6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[Ref_b-1] "Natural England". english-nature.org.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2016.

[Ref_c-2] "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 25 May 2007. Retrieved 23 May 2007. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[Ref_2004-3] Cite error: The named reference Ref_2004 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[Ref_2005-4] "Stone age discovery in roadworks". BBC News. 6 September 2005. Retrieved 23 April 2010.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]