Talk:71st World Science Fiction Convention

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Who is bidding?

edit

There was a fair amount of research done by someone else which resulted in Zagreb and Texas [1] being added to this article. Both bids were also added to a list of upcoming bids. [2] While I don't know the background of it being listed there the research for this article included what appeared to be an announcement at Denvention, a bid website, and a fair amount of discussion.

A change was then made to this article stating explicitly that "Texas is currently exploring the possibility of putting together a bid, but has not announced that they will have a bid." The comment explaining that change was somewhat stronger and both were in direct contradiction to what had been said in the article previously and the general understanding of the situation.

I had been working with the data I had when Ed Dravecky III said, in response to a post of mine about this, that the next meeting of the exploratory committee would be at ArmadilloCon. The article has been edited so that the apparent bid announcement does not reflect poorly on ALAMO and the contraction to that announcement does not reflect poorly on a Texas bid.

I'm putting this on a 'talk' page rather than just annotating changes so that things can be clarified.

--Kovar (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)KovarReply

I deleted the Minneapolis and San Jose bids, as I can find no evidence thay they exist -- and I looked hard. They aren't on Chaz Boston Baden's list of bids, they weren't mentioned in the Denvention newsletters, Google searches found nothing, and posts to the rec.arts.sf.fandom newsgroup and to the WSFA and PRSFS email lists got no replies. Keith Lynch (talk) 01:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Minneapolis is a hoax bid; I've put in the correct information. San Jose had announced and no on on the SMOFs list protested when the list of four bids was posted but removing it makes sense. Kovar (talk) 02:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)KovarReply

Anything new on the Texas bid? I know that the meeting was planned for ArmadilloCon but because of various things haven't tracked down the results. I'll do so later but thought it worthwhile to ask here Kovar (talk) 07:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)KovarReply

For the record, the Texas in 2013 bid formally launched at Anticipation in Montreal with the announcement that San Antonio was selected as the bid city. - Dravecky (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 71st World Science Fiction Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 71st World Science Fiction Convention. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply