Talk:71 Engineer Regiment (United Kingdom)

Military history: British / European Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 71 Engineer Regiment (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/vols-tavr/art-eng-sig/engr71.htm

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Corrected formatting/usage for http://regiments.org/regiments/uk/volmil-scotland/vengr/edin.htm

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150210181608/http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/territorial-army-royal-engineers/regiments-80-177-territorial-army.html to http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/territorial-army-royal-engineers/regiments-80-177-territorial-army.html

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic