Talk:37 Days (TV series)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources
edit- 37 Days; Line of Duty; Mind the Gap: London vs the Rest – review
- 37 Days; Coronation Street: A Moving Story – TV review
- 37 Days, BBC2 - Saturday 8th March, TV Review
- 37 days on BBC2 tonight with Ian McDiarmid as Sir Edward Grey in final part of World War I political thriller
- 37 Days: cricket and sang-froid as Britain awaited World War I
- 37 Days might make you rather nervous about news coming out of Russia and the Ukraine
- TV REVIEW: 37 Days, BBC2, Thursday March 6
- 37 Days on BBC2 tonight with Nicholas Asbury as Winston Churchill and Tim Piggott Smith as Asquith in political thriller leading up to outbreak of World War I
- Catch up TV: Mind the Gap: London vs the Rest, 37 Days and True Detective
- What to Watch: Tonight's TV Picks - Birds of a Feather, 37 Days, Rake
- 37 Days, Crufts 2014 and Holiday Hit Squad: TV picks
- McDiarmid drawn to 37 Days script
- 37 Days on BBC2 tonight - new political thriller about the final weeks before the outbreak of the First World War with Ian McDiarmid as foreign secretary Sir Edward Grey
- New drama 37 Days reveals the conflicts that led to WWI
- TV Review: 37 Days
- 37 Days is a history lesson for us all - says Kathy Griffiths
- Countdown to war ‘like a boulder gathering force’ iin BBC2 docu-drama 37 Days
- 37 Days, TV review: A political thriller that grippingly uncovers the countdown to war
- 37 Days: Catastrophic events leading to First World War makes for must-see historical drama
- For just one programme about World War I, 37 Days is the smartest choice
- 37 Days, BBC2 (good for production section)
- 37 Days on BBC Two
- Queen Victoria's grandson was too racist for BBC2 First World War drama
- 37 Days, BBC Two, review
Production - pov criticism
edit"Despite drawing on historical archives, the BBC adaptation carried a slanted view of events told exclusively from the British perspective and thereby carrying a noticeable bias. This is particularly evident in the portrayal of characters such as the Kaiser and the Czar who are reduced to mere buffonery. Even the portrayal of the main character Sir Edward Grey is not based on an accurate reading of the man. Indeed the series often degenerates into mere propaganda which aims to place Winston Churchill particularly in a favourable light that in turn draws on a latter role in the WW2, rather than the facts and events in the lead up to the Great War."
This is of course a wholly unsourced unreferenced personal judgement coloured by the poster's own view of history.
It doesn't belong in the article at all - unless somebody wants to hedge it about with a "some claim". But even then there are doubtless just as many claiming that, within the limits of fiction, this is a reasonable summation of events. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.247.236 (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)