Talk:36 Crazyfists

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

ALTERNATIVE METAL

edit

I believe that they fall somewhere between alternative metal and metalcore in my opinion. They do not sound anything like post-hardcore.24.129.103.212 (talk) 17:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nu-metal

edit

I think there should be some mention of the obvious nu-metal on the first album and the influences it has had on the latter releases. I think it has had a significant impact on their songwriting and deserves mentioning, I am not sure how to go about it though, but I find that many artist pages lack description of what the albums actually sounded like, for a band like 36CF it might be ok, since they only released 3 albums to date but for a band like sepulture, for example, that would be confusing since they changed their style often. I think adding such a section here could be an good idea.

Yea, nu-metal or alt. metal is obvious. They can be post-hardcore but NEVER METALCORE!! It has nothing to do with that. You wikipedia editors know nothin about metalcore... if it sounds a bit metallic and has screams that can only be metalcoooooore... idiots... I agree with the numetal theory.

I agree completly with this. It should be changed. Indie -0 15:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Can we have a vote to remove the metalcore label from this page? Indie -0 17:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The critics label 36 CF as metalcore. I agree that they are way more post-hardcore than metalcore, but they do have a lot of songs that fall under the metalcore banner, plus they are recognised as a metalcore band, so I don't think it should be removed at all. 82.7.57.34 03:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Their official site labels them metalcore so leave metalcore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.146.98 (talk) 18:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Official sites don't mean shit as it's a first party source.Hoponpop69 (talk) 01:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

They have metalcore elements like breakdowns. "I'll Go Until My Heart Stops," has a definite Metalcore Breakdown —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.147.77 (talk) 02:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

OMG why dnt we just label every heavy band that started after korn Nu-Metal? Hell, half the bands under the tag don't fit the description anyway... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.230.170.174 (talk) 11:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

After listening to most of the songs off of The Tide And Its Takers, I can say that they are definately Metalcore. And I listen to a lot of Metalcore so I know what it is. KezianAvenger (talk) 16:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 36 Crazy Fists

edit

The 36 Crazy Fists was a 1977 cult movie directed by Jackie Chan, should this be mentioned as a possible reference for the band title? Goroliath

yes.
Unless you have a relevant citation, speculation probably shouldnt be mentioned in the article. Josh LeePAGE|TALK 18:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

i agree i dont know much about this band but on first listening to them they sound immediately like post-hardcore

Unspecified source for Image:A Snow Capped Romance.jpg

edit

I found Image:A Snow Capped Romance.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 05:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:A Snow Capped Romance.jpg

edit
 

Image:A Snow Capped Romance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talkcontribsBot) 05:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:BitternessTheStar.jpg

edit
 

Image:BitternessTheStar.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Discography

edit

As there is such an in depth list of titles I believe this would be enough to constitute a separate page.. Yellowxander (talk) 15:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 36 Crazyfists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 36 Crazyfists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply