Talk:35 mm movie film

35 mm movie film is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 17, 2007.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 26, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
September 2, 2006	Featured article candidate	Promoted
May 4, 2010	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Photography High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Baroncini, Vittorio; Mahler, Henry; Sintas, Matthieu (February–March 2004). "The Image Resolution of 35mm Cinema Film in Theatrical Presentation". SMPTE. 113 (2–3): 60–66. doi:10.5594/J12310. ISSN 1545-0279.
Lahue, Kalton C.; Bailey, Joseph A. (September 1, 2001). Glass, Brass, and Chrome: The American 35mm Miniature Camera. University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 9780806134345.
Gschwind, Rudolf. "Restoration of Movie Films by Digital Image Processing" (PDF). Preserve then Show. Danish Film Institute: 168–178.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Differences in Movie and still film

I don't know exactily today what's in kodak eastman catalog but a few years ago colors films were different but the B & W were excatlly the same. This mainly IMHO due to the use of artificial light.(by the way motion picture use mainly negative film like most amateur photographer and not inversible film like in super 8). About the perforation it seems there is a super 35mm variant with different perforations. But in seems perforation in movie film could differ at differnet stages between the negative and the final copy to avoid geometrical distortions.

I found this about the subject but I did not read in extenso. http://www.kodak.de/US/en/motion/students/handbook/perforations1.jhtml Ericd 09:54 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)

Super 35

My understanding of Super 35 is that a larger picture area is used, including the soundtrack area; this corresponds roughly with the picture area available in the silent area. For theatre distribution the top and bottom are cropped and the image is optically squished to standard anamorphic widescreen size, while for video & TV the exact picture size can be tailored scene-by-scene -- unlike conventional pan & scan, wide scenes can be preserved by zooming out and including that top and bottom space that was cropped out of the theater release. As far as I know there's nothing special with perforations, but I could be wrong. --Brion 22:38 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)

I don't know exactly how it's done but super 8, super 16, super 35 are always the same trick : a larger image with the same film width. For super 8 that's done with different perforations for super 16 and super 35 I don't know. Ericd 22:54 Sep 7, 2002 (UTC)

Same trick: smaller perforations. Look at the end of film formats, I've put in a link to a site with over hundred movie formats - it is an truly excellent site.

I've made a 135 film page too, for photography. There is still a few sentences about photography in 35mm film - IMHO they should be moved to 135. I know the film medium is basically the same, but I would say a split with cross links is the best solution. A reader would normally be intested in either the photo or the movie side - and of course should be told about the connection User:Egil

DH perforation

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Found a mistake with the radius of the hole corner roundings of the Dubray-Howell perforation. It should be 0.013" or 0,33 mm as with the AC type (CS), not 0.02" or 0,5 mm. --Filmtechniker (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

CS perf

Conversation moved to Talk:Film perforations.

Add topic