2-person parties in non-independents

edit

Should we just put the candidates from the parties with 2 candidates in the non-independents column in Candidates section? Based on the older Senate election articles, the non-independents column tend to include candidates with party affiliation that weren't part of any slates. Thanks! --Janbryan (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

What's the difference between Aksyon's 3-person slate and WPP/LPP/LM's 2-person slates?
FWIW, 2019 election separated PFP and UNA's 2-person slate into their separate tables until you placed them together with other one party/one person "slates". Howard the Duck (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
LDP-Aquino wing candidates in the 2004 election and LM/PMM candidates in the 2016 election are part of the non-independents column. I merely copied this for the 2019 election.--Janbryan (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I guess it would be respectful if you answer my question? Howard the Duck (talk) 16:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
FWIW, 2013 Philippine Senate election calls this "Non-independents not in tickets", which is essentially what tables such as this be (it is called differently on other articles). A slate in elections is defined as "a group of candidates that run in multi-seat or multi-position elections on a common platform." Considering that 1) running on the same party means you are, at the very least by definition, "running on a common platform," and that 2) a group is "a number of people or things that are located, gathered, or classed together", a slate of two is acceptable. Howard the Duck (talk) 16:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
To answer your question, one is associated with a presidential candidate, whereas the other is not. There has been a history of modifications in previous Senate articles in which candidates are either grouped based on official slates or when a party has more than two candidates. These "non-independents" columns used to have "not in tickets" attached to their title as well.--Janbryan (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Who is the presidential candidate in the PDDS/PDP-Laban slate? Who are the presidential candidates in the 2019, 2013, 2001, 1995, 1971, 1967, 1963, 1959, 1955, 1951 and 1947 slates? Should we place Baldomero Falcone in a separate table because he has a presidential candidate?
Facts:
  1. Slates are not just restricted if there's a presidential candidate backing them.
  2. This is a Wiki. Yes, there's a history of modifications because that's how it is supposed to work. I modified yours. There used to be sections for "Administration" and "opposition" slates... but apparently we're not doing that this year. Fine. We edit as we go, but it should be based on something.
Howard the Duck (talk) 16:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I reverted my edits. The only reason I wasn't poised to include administration and opposition sections was because lines have been blurred which slates should be considered as administration or opposition. Thanks!--Janbryan (talk) 17:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Uniteam Alliance, Lacson-Sotto Slate → Uniteam, Lacson-Sotto

edit

In Infoboxes, If we refer to the Liberal Party as "Liberal" and refer to the Nacionalista Party as "Nacionalista", why shouldn't we cut "Alliance" and "Slate" when referring to these two coalitions as not only are they already known by these names, that fact makes it slightly jarring to read specially when its already marked as an alliance by the infobox itself.

I'd be ok with naming UniTeam Alliance as plain old "UniTeam". Lacson-Sotto slate should be named im full as it is a descriptive, not a proper, name. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply