Talk:2022 NCAA Division I women's basketball championship game/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 15:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

I'll complete this review within a week. Riley1012 (talk) 15:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

• Hey PCN02WPS I apologize for the delay, I had a family situation. I will do the review this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

@Riley1012: no worries, I haven’t had all that much time recently either so take your time. Thanks for letting me know. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 18:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

1. Well-written

• "It determined the national champion for the 2021–22 season, and was contested..." remove comma or make the second part an independent clause
• "The Gamecocks, who represent University..." should be the University
• "The Gamecocks entered this game with no injuries which would affect their line up" should be lineup since it is a noun in this sentence
• "giving South Carolina a nine point lead at the conclusion of the third quarter" add hyphen (nine-point lead)

2. Verifiable

• On the reference list some have "ESPN.com" while others have "ESPN" as the website source. This should be consistent throughout
• I noticed reference 2 currently links to information about the 2023 tournament. Is there an archived version of the link with the 2022 information?
• Reference 4 leads to page not found.
• Reference 13 also links to information about the current (22-23) season. Same issue with 21.
• Copyvio check looks good

3. Broad

• Is there anything that could be added to the media coverage section? Perhaps who commentated the game or the viewership numbers?

6. Illustrated

• One image of Boston is copyright free and relevant. Are there any other free images of the other starters or coaches that could be added? No big deal if not.

The article is neutral and stable. Well done overall. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

@Riley1012: I think everything's taken care of - I added an image of Bueckers but I'm hesitant to add more in order to avoid crowding the game summary section. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 17:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@PCN02WPS: That makes sense to me. All of the changes look good to me. -Riley1012 (talk) 01:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)