Talk:2021 Haitian migrant whip controversy

Templates removed

• This article was re-written to read less like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay stating the editor's personal feelings. User:Ray.lowry
• This article is no longer an orphan, and has links to and from other Wikipedia pages User:Ray.lowry
• Multiple Issue Templates were removed following the rule quoted below:User:Ray.lowry

1. You may remove a template when according to your best judgement the lack of edits and/or talk page discussion should be interpreted as the issue not worth fixing (as a form of "silent consensus"). Please note there is currently no consensus for general age-related removal of maintenance templates - that is, removing a template purely or chiefly because it is old is not considered a sufficient argument. Exception: removing POV-related templates whose discussions have gone dormant is encouraged, as addressed in the bullet point immediately above;

Renaming

• I acted in good faith in both creating this page, and removing Multiple Issue Templates. I object to the name change. Typing the term “Whip Gate” into the search bar currently links to the renamed article, but how long will this last? And what of the five other pages that link to this article? User:Ray.lowry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.179.129.53 (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

• I don't have any objection to the page existing. I moved it to September 2021 Haitian migrant photo controversy both because Whip Gate was less neutral, and because I didn't see evidence of it being widely used in reliable sources. The links from other pages will be automatically fixed by a bot. Ganesha811 (talk) 18:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Bullshit

This article is complete bullshit without the photo in question. Somebody needs to add the photo, or delete this article. 73.131.102.159 (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing..

North8000 (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work.

North8000 (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

"Split reins controversy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Split reins controversy and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 15#Split reins controversy until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

"Whip Gate - Incidents During the Biden Administration" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Whip Gate - Incidents During the Biden Administration and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 24#Whip Gate - Incidents During the Biden Administration until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:45, 24 July 2022 (UTC)