This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Someone please tell me why secondary sources are better when they have stupid-ass bias and are completely unreliable unlike what a maggot thinks, because as far as I'm concerned, the NCA is the only source available AND needed to fit. Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
