Talk:2019 Romanian presidential election
 | A news item involving 2019 Romanian presidential election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 25 November 2019. |  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
'Fiefdom'
editHi, I'm was initially confused by the 'fiefdom' bit at the bottom. I assume 'fiefdom' is supposed to refer to where the political base of the candidate is considered to be, but this strikes me as something that would not be clear to most audiences and perhaps could do with better explanation and fine-tuning. CTerry (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
There is no need for additional explanations. Someone deleted it.Wekahash (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
RfC
editThe consensus is that while the article does not need more photos, it is fine to add more photos if as Staberinde said, "It could be that there are indeed some images really worthy of inclusion." Editors are allowed to boldly add more photos and if there are any objections to particular photos, the objections should be discussed on a case-by-case basis.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Should more pictures about Elections added in the article?Krishna's flute (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- I can't find any discussion on this matter (see WP:RFCBEFORE), so why have you gone straight to a full-blown thirty-day formal RfC? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Because I can see some files have been deleted from here. If more pictures are there there then it makes Wikipedia article good and illustrative. But if discussion is needed for RfC then somebody should close this. I will do discussion.Krishna's flute (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- No I'm not sure what types of images you want to add to this article, but from what i'm already seeing there are more than the average amount of pictures already on this article. I don't believe any more pictures need to be added. Cook907 (talk) 20:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- No How can you show multiple pictures of an election. One is enough. There are only so many ways one can visually display people voting.HAL333 01:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- No I'm not sure what types of images you want to add to this article, but from what i'm already seeing there are more than the average amount of pictures already on this article. I don't believe any more pictures need to be added. Cook907 (talk) 20:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
- Because I can see some files have been deleted from here. If more pictures are there there then it makes Wikipedia article good and illustrative. But if discussion is needed for RfC then somebody should close this. I will do discussion.Krishna's flute (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- No More is ill defined. One more? Eight? The article is fill of pictures, graphs, and tables. -Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- What? - such vague RfC question is useless. It could be that there are indeed some images really worthy of inclusion, but it could be also that all available images not already in article are fairly irrelevant and would add nothing.--Staberinde (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
