Talk:2019 FIFA Club World Cup
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File uploads
editI don't understand why other users keep on uploading the same file I already uploaded, but with another name. It's nonsense, and if you fix anything you should upload it under the same name to give me the credits of uploading base file for. Current version of File:2019 FIFA Club World Cup.svg fixes a couple of mistakes I did unintentionally and you didn't even notice (the big one being the misplacement of the second F's border, which was near the third coloured dot, counting from above). --Genericool (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Pinging Flix11 and Yogwi21. There's also an extended explanation here. Personally I don't quite see why we'd use a SVG at all. FIFA seems to be using PNG or JPEG; why should we use a different file format instead of using the logo as published on their own website, eg here or here, cropped to remove the sponsorship if necessary (no opinion on whether that is necessary)? That would immediately and authoritatively resolve all the issues about misplacements, colours and the like, and since there's no need to edit an official logo, being non-editable is not a problem here. Since according to Genericool crediting the original uploader is desirable, we should go with the file name under which the logo was uploaded first; that'd be File:2019 FIFA Club World Cup emblem.png. Huon (talk) 01:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Huon: I'm not very familiar with image policy but I think this page states that "images composed of simple shapes, lines, and letters such as those below should be recreated using vector graphics as an SVG file". I can't find an actual policy or guideline page to support this, but I assume that it is reflective of current consensus. I'm not sure what counts as being "composed of simple shapes, lines, and letters", but there are pretty complicated logos listed in that category, so perhaps this logo should be recreated in SVG too. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- I don't see how this logo constitutes "simple shapes, lines and letters". I mean, if you strip down any image, especially a modern, computer-designed logo, to its bare bones you'll get only a few simple lines and shapes, but this logo looks too complex to me to be recreated as an SVG. – PeeJay 17:41, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- When there'a a dispute about which recreation has fewer errors or is otherwise more appropriate, maybe it's not so simple after all. Huon (talk) 03:18, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Genericool: I admitted my mistake. I should've uploaded the revision in your file. I support using File:2019 FIFA Club World Cup.svg in this article. I suggest to delete my revision in Flix11's file.Yogwi21 (talk) 10:55, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry to both @Genericool: and @Yogwi21:, for the logo disputes in 2019 FCWC and 2020 Copa America. I would like to upload Yogwi21's to Genericool's to show my good will but was rejected because the SVG code is empty, like Genericool's. Flix11 (talk) 11:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Huon: FIFA do uses vector format in Match Calendar PDF file which I credited as source. I just took my time to clean up the PDF from what was not needed and then reduce code as I said in W:HD. About the name of the file, I followed the naming convention of previous years. Actually, all I did was to repeat what was done in previous years, hence my surprise. --Genericool (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's worth mentioning that there are PNG images embedded into the file, so it is not a "true" SVG. I'd agree with Huon to use the original file, which is half the size of the SVG. S.A. Julio (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- S.A. Julio was right on both topics. Old file had PNG embedded (not my fault, as it was result of the mask effect used by FIFA designer). Size were double than the (now deleted) PNG file. So, today I published a new version of File:2019 FIFA Club World Cup.svg as per the new version of Match Calendar. It comes from an official source and addresses both issues found on my previous file. Should we use it? --Genericool (talk) 13:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- It's worth mentioning that there are PNG images embedded into the file, so it is not a "true" SVG. I'd agree with Huon to use the original file, which is half the size of the SVG. S.A. Julio (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Huon: FIFA do uses vector format in Match Calendar PDF file which I credited as source. I just took my time to clean up the PDF from what was not needed and then reduce code as I said in W:HD. About the name of the file, I followed the naming convention of previous years. Actually, all I did was to repeat what was done in previous years, hence my surprise. --Genericool (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Huon: I'm not very familiar with image policy but I think this page states that "images composed of simple shapes, lines, and letters such as those below should be recreated using vector graphics as an SVG file". I can't find an actual policy or guideline page to support this, but I assume that it is reflective of current consensus. I'm not sure what counts as being "composed of simple shapes, lines, and letters", but there are pretty complicated logos listed in that category, so perhaps this logo should be recreated in SVG too. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 02:39, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)