Talk:2019

Latest comment: 9 months ago by HouseBlaster in topic Is this right?

Is this right?

edit

The article is saying that 1923 media will enter the public domain in 2019, contradicting the fact that it must be at least 95 years old to be in the public domain. It implies that the actual number of years is 96, not 95. What am I confusing?? Georgia guy (talk) 00:51, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Georgia guy: this is very late, but see Public Domain Day. In short, once something has been published for 95 years, it enters the PD at the end of that calendar year. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

2019 being described as a best year in human history.

edit

For a reason, most of the news media outlets describe 2019 as a "best year in human history." But there are other good years described and nominated by other media outlets such as 2015, 1994, 2007, and especially 1980. Can anyone please explain why those editors add it as the best year in history in one article, while adding the year 2020 as the worst for anyone to be alive. I think that there is a need for a consensus to be established. Give me examples. 204.129.232.191 (talk) 16:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I would support its removal here and anywhere else it appears. Deb (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Deb But why would you support its removal even though it can be added in other years with very reliable sources? Explain? 204.129.232.191 (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
To me, it's still someone's opinion, and newspapers aren't qualified to judge on a completely subjective issue like this. Deb (talk) 18:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Because 2019 is the last year before the pandemic hit. Many people feel nostalgic about it now.213.230.87.65 (talk) 02:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
'Most' of the news media outlets? Can you name even one? Bkatcher (talk) 03:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
You know that this type of statement still remains on this article as of 2024, and newspapers are still regarded as reliable sources no matter what. -“Userbase3913” (talk) 01:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2023

edit

Would you please add this event?

This one comes with a source cited. — 2600:1010:B1A7:5CE1:F888:A176:26F6:1B94 (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

marking answered, not done per above. GiovanniSidwell (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Milutinović, A. "SVE O NOVOM AUTOPUTU "MILOŠ VELIKI" KOJI SE OTVARA DANAS Kolike su putarine i ograničenja, kada će biti pumpi i 4 MAPE UKLJUČENJA". Blic.rs (in Serbian). Retrieved 2022-11-27.

Collage depreciation

edit
Discussion started by blocked sock 33ABGirl (talk) 04:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Years#Lead_image, a discussion on whether to depreciate collages in general in going on. Please share your thoughts.--Marginataen (talk) 21:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Date format

edit
Discussion started by blocked sock 33ABGirl (talk) 04:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I would also like to suggest changing the date format of this article to the DMY format (e.g. 6 June 2020 as opposed to June 6, 2020). The DMY format seems more international and more suitable for a "global" article like. Also DMY simply makes more sense as it goes from smallest to highest.

At the village pump, I've presented a proposal to establish a standard to use DMY in general for all articles about "generic" years. The discussion got kind of messy however, and I'll propaly restart it at some point. In the meantime, I would like it to create consensus about changing it for specifically this and all other nine articles about the 2010s--Marginataen (talk) 16:11, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply