Talk:2017 UK Championship

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Lee Vilenski in topic GA Review

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:UK Championship which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


page move

edit

@Adam Cuerden: That should have been done through an RM because it affects other things and will probably be contested. For example, why have you only moved this article? What about 2018 UK Championship, 2016 UK Championship, etc.? Titles are now inconsistent. There's recently already been a discussion on the naming of this championship, which came to the conclusion that the snooker champs is the most notable as carrying the title "UK Championship". So I suspect your move will be reverted but I'll wait to see what others (Lee?) say. Rodney Baggins (talk) 08:08, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Adam Cuerden: I have moved it back. See discussion at Talk:1977 UK Championship which is the latest of a number of discussions on the naming of this page and similar ones (also at Talk:UK Championship. Nigej (talk) 08:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
At best it's a contested move. At worst it's a complete disregard for prior consensus Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2017 UK Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


Comments

That's a first breeze through, so I'll place the article on hold. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 14:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

With all the recent talk about flags, do we really think it necessary to put these flags in the "Century breaks" section? Does the nationality matter at all in that section? The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Probably a question for WT:SNOOKER, or at MOS:FLAG. I don't really care either way, but the full removal will likely cause backlash without an actual conversation. In comparrison to the flagicon/athlete issue, in this case the MOS hasn't been broken. I'll start a conversation soon about it. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Aparently the flag in the century breaks column is quite recent, so I've removed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:14, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
I would also consider the use of dynamic columns, using {{div col}} and {{div col end}}, that way the columns dynamically adjust according to browser width. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 07:52, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Looking good, just a final few words on the refs:

  • You link World Snooker three and format not in italics. Later it's not linked and in italics. Be consistent in the formatting, and either link once or every time.
  Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • You have Guardian and the Guardian, it's actually The Guardian.

  Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Don't think you need the name of the website in the title (e.g. ref 34 has BBC Sport in the title, see ref 41 as well, check others).

The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 06:50, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Okeydokes, I think I've hammered you enough on this one. I'm satisfied that it meets the requirements for GA (and beyond), so I'll pass it. Good work. The Rambling Man (REJOICE!) 08:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your help The Rambling Man! I appreciate any input to make these articles better. If this was a suitable FA nominee when I've worked on it a bit more, let me know. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply