Talk:2016 West Virginia flood

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 2601:5C5:4201:68B0:5505:764F:EC61:59F2 in topic There are more and better free images that could be used…
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2016 West Virginia flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

There are more and better free images that could be used…

edit

There are more free images from the summaries that the NWS offices in Charleston and Blacksburg did about the flooding that fully describe the extent of the flooding. I think those images should at least be uploaded to commons. Or possibly even be used for this article somewhere.

(I would do it myself, but as evidenced by the IP address showing up, I am an unregistered user and can’t upload) 2601:5C5:4201:68B0:5505:764F:EC61:59F2 (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply