Talk:2016 Nevada Democratic presidential caucuses
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Material from United States presidential election in Nevada, 2016 was split to Nevada Democratic caucuses and convention, 2016 on 17 March 2016, 10:22:59. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:United States presidential election in Nevada, 2016. |
Hullabaloo
editWhat about the May 14 State Convention? [1], [2], [3]. It looks like worth mentioning. -Thylacin (talk) 08:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
State Convention
editIn paragraph one, reports of violence have been disputed. Although the NYT cites instances of chair throwing, NPR has published a fact-checking article disputing this. [1]
In paragraph two, only the POV of Jon Ralston and the NV Democratic Party are presented. The direct quote from his article implies that his opinion is "fact". In light of new information, this is in dispute. [2]
I believe paragraph three is balanced between opposing POV.
SunriseEarth (talk) 10:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- In re: chair being thrown. NPR ombudsman says merely that there is no video and that reports disagree - they usually do in incidents of this sort. However, both the AP and the NYTimes published this assertion. Both are knows to check concrete facts of this sort and would have had the opportunity to speak to neutral witnesses, i.e. the security personnel. But since we have two extremely reputable news sources backing this up, and Politifact saying "no clear evidence of a chair being thrown" with a link to a video, I think it stays until or unless the Times or AP retracts the statement. On the assumption that witnesses may have offered facts that were not caught on anyone's iPhone. (If a tree falls in a forest and no one catches it on video, did it fall?).E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The last paragraph unfairly characterizes the events at the state convention. It is sourced by a Snopes article which does not mention any of the events listed in the paragraph, and further implies that the reporting of violence was fabricated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.184.236 (talk) 20:56, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nevada Democratic caucuses and convention, 2016. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160518113035/http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/pall-nevada-fracas-hangs-democratic-contest-39161207 to http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/pall-nevada-fracas-hangs-democratic-contest-39161207
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Latino/Latina/Latinx
editHi Edificio Barro,
It would make sense to use "Latinx" if we did not know the gender of the person involved, but in the sentence "Clinton had campaigned heavily in the state, airing an ad in which she comforted a young ... girl who was worried her parents would be deported", and in the description for the video in question she is described as a "girl", so I think it is pretty reasonable to use "Latina" here, per the guideline on precision and clarity, which says:
- Do not omit gender when the result is pointlessly vague: "Queen Elizabeth II is the mother of Charles, Prince of Wales" rather than "Queen Elizabeth II is a parent of Charles, Prince of Wales"
I note that your edit has now been reverted by three different editors, so I don't think I have misunderstood the guidelines. Can you explain why you think "Latinx girl" is preferable to "Latina girl" in this case? cpcallen (talk) 13:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2016 Iowa Democratic caucuses which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 08:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)