Talk:2015 Giro d'Italia

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review

Orphaned references in 2015 Giro d'Italia

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2015 Giro d'Italia's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "demystified":

  • From Cima Coppi: Laura Weislo (13 May 2008). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 13 July 2013.
  • From 1999 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo (13 May 2008). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on 17 June 2014. Retrieved 13 July 2013. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From 2006 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo and Tim Maloney (2007-05-18). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Archived from the original on 8 January 2010. Retrieved 2009-12-01. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From 2008 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo (2008-05-13). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Archived from the original on 13 July 2014. Retrieved 2009-08-27. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 8 May 2013 suggested (help); Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  • From 2014 Giro d'Italia: Laura, Weislo (13 May 2008). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. Retrieved 27 August 2009.
  • From 1983 Giro d'Italia: Laura Weislo (2008-05-13). "Giro d'Italia classifications demystified". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2009-08-27.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 21:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Giro d'Italia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Glad to review this. Expect my reviews around Tuesday/Wednesday :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I changed Sanremo to San Remo to make it consistent with the mention of Milan - San Remo in the article. I hope that's OK. Things that should be looked into:

  • Lead: It might be worth mentioning that Contador won the Giro without winning a stage. Maybe you can also find instances where others did the same and note that in the Race Overview section?
  • Lead: Also worth mentioning that Nizzolo won the points classification without winning a stage.
  • Teams: Any chance that a source mentioned the fact that Cofidis wasn't invited? After all, I find that pretty significant considering they were a major WorldTour Team for years...
  • Pre-race favorites: Optional: I find the image of Contador there now to be not ideal, since you cannot see his face. Maybe one from the 2011 Giro would be better, even if he was stripped from that title? After all, he was also driving for his current team back then.
  • Pre-race favorites: You should explain why Froome and Nibali are significant enough to be mentioned.

That's it really. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Zwerg Nase, for your review and edits. I'm a bit in two minds about Sanremo, but I've no objection to "San Remo". Wikipedia isn't consistent on the question. I've replied to your other points above: do take a look and see if you're satisfied! Relentlessly (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
All done, another pass, congrats :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply