Talk:2015 FA Community Shield/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A close to flawless article. For one, I would recommend that in the "Background" section, you write having defeated Manchester City a year earlier instead of "ago". Sounds good? Also, there is a dead link that should be replaced with an archieved version.
On hold for now. Good job! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing, I've replaced the dead link and tweaked the background section. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)