Talk:2013 Czech political corruption scandal

Title

The title needs work. Suggestions? Abductive (reasoning) 04:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

What's wrong with it? - filelakeshoe (t / c) 08:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

It wasn't just the raids, the raids were only the beginning of the affair. And more importantly, bribery and abuse of power isn't what people imagine under "organized crime."--Kohelet (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

So "2013 Czech political corruption scandal"? Not sure if that wouldn't be ambiguous. I don't think calling the article "NagyGate" or any title which singles out Nagyová is particularly NPOV, despite what cs.wiki do. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 21:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

How is it NPOV when it's called that way in the Czech media? Nevertheless, any title is better than the current one.--Kohelet (talk) 22:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Any title is better than the current one?? You mean for example "Construction of submarines in Zanzibar"? Please, offer some constructive solution. Nagyová is not the only person involved in the scandal, even though she is the main target for the media. I believe we don't have to follow the strange naming conventions of the Czech Wikipedia (you wouldn't believe but Czech Republic is a redirect there :D) or the sensational style of—not only tabloid—Czech media. "Causa Nagyová" or "NagyGate" is simplifying and inappropriate for a neutral encyclopedic project. I agree that the current title is not perfect, the situation is too complicated and still developing. "2013 Czech political corruption scandal" looks like a good option. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

And the media do not usually write in the NPOV. We do. - filelakeshoe (t / c) 08:07, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Does anybody object to 2013 Czech political corruption scandal? Abductive (reasoning) 18:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)