Talk:2013–14 Serie A

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Serie A Detailed Schedule

edit

I realize that as of July 22, 2013, the Serie A schedule for this upcoming season has not yet been set, but I refer you do the Italian Serie A page for the 2012-13 season:

look under the heading Calendario e risultati and you will find the detailed schedule listing for the past season. I am hoping that for this year, our community will add a similar schedule, something that has been done on the italian side since wikipedia was established. Such a schedule is only possible in leagues similar to Seria A which have a set double round-robin format where every team plays one game per round. For those who bring up the copyright issues that involve the English Premier League, please note that no such copyright restrictions exist for the Serie A schedule. Please comment.AntropovNikki (talk) 03:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Club Emblems in front of Team Names

edit

Can we remove all the club emblems from the various tables in this article? It clutters the information unnecessarily and is rather distracting. Italia2006 (talk) 14:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Of course. He copied from the italian wikipedia. Stigni (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Goals/assists reference

edit

The current goals/assists table reference from Soccerway lists Gervinho at 9 assists and Pogba at 6. In comparison, more highly regarded sources such as Corriere dello Sport, ESPN, or WhoScored list Gervinho being the sole table leader at 10 assists, with Pogba having only 5. Pogba's own player profile on juventus.com also has him at 5 assists. The fact that our current source gives Pogba one more assist that elsewhere indicates this is not an updating issue, rather it is either an error or a different method to record assists. As a result, I am replacing the current source with ESPN. Do U(knome)? yes...or no 23:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Inter Milan as TQ for Europa League

edit

It's mentioned that Inter are qualified for the EL next year on eurosport and here too, but if Torino and AC Milan win both of their games, they finish on 61 and 60 points, respectively. Inter now has 60 with equal head to head record against Milan, so it is possible they finish 7th. Nayefjuve (talk) 00:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes that is why I removed the TQ. They have not mathematically qualified yet. QED237 (talk) 00:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Parma not playing EL?

edit

I couldn't find any source that says Parma is excluded from European competition next season. One source from May 14 mentions that they made a late payment for taxes due to a misunderstanding, but no decision was made then or now. Nayefjuve (talk) 18:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013–14 Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply