Talk:2012 Paris–Nice/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Disc Wheel (talk · contribs) 00:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Will get to this in a few hours or so. Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 00:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

This was well written, references are solid, and images check out. Great work. Pass. Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 03:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)