Talk:2009 North American SuperLiga

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

And Canada?

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Who gets in from Canada?

No one. I have another question though: When will it start? UmutK (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Canadian MLS teams, if they qualify through MLS. MLS has one Canadian team, in Toronto, and a second, in Vancouver, to be added to the league in 2011. Nateji77 (talk) 05:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, this isn't like the CONCACAF Champions League where it is U.S. Soccer that sends a slate of teams to the competition. This tournament is run by Soccer United Marketing, and is a Major League Soccer-Primera División de México competition, so MLS can send one of its Canadian teams if it so chooses. -- Grant .Alpaugh 07:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:SuperLiga.png

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The image File:SuperLiga.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have looked over wikipedia guidelines for this and i do think it has what is adequate. moreover, this is a false positive and i shall restore the image Dylant2011 (talk) 22:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Time Zone Selection

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I find it curious that the times listed for the games are all done from the EDT- I bring this up because of the Eight clubs in the competition Six are from the CDT. 12 Matches are being played in the group stage and half of them (Six) are in the CDT while only four in the EDT and the remaining two are being played out west in the PDT. It seems to me that most people who might be interested in this competition live or follow clubs from the CDT. Morry32 (talk) 17:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I personally think that using a standard time zone is appropriate. It seems also that, where events occur in different time zones, the customary time zone used in the region should be appropriate. Since all of the games occur in the United States, it would seem natural to use what the United States uses as its customary time zone when displaying events. I think, though only through experience, that where events are spread throughout the US, the common time zone to use is the Eastern. Thus, I think it should stay the way it is. Gregorybean (talk) 17:26, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

What do you guys think of the t ie-breaking procedure?

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Last year, Guadalajara was in a situation where, if they lost by 8 or more goals, they would have gone to the semifinals. Instead, they lost by only 2, and got eliminated. Isn't that ridiculous? These tie-breaking rules are retarded. What do you guys think?

It's indeed a little funny but i believe it was because it would have given another team a better gal differential which i do think is a fair meter of who should go through Dylant2011 (talk) 22:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Chivas USA vs UANL, Pulido goal Alans or Armandos?

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The ESPN source (http://soccernet-assets.espn.go.com/match?id=270353&league=CONCACAF.SUPERLIGA&cc=3888) has the UANL goal marked for Alan while the superliga article (http://web.superliga2009.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090621&content_id=5442374&vkey=news_superliga&fext=.jsp) quotes the goal as being Armandos. This would give Armando 3 goals (as of the group stage) and the top scorer:

The visitors went ahead in the 11th minute thanks to an Armando Pulido bicycle kick that will surely make the highlight reels.

Yukata Ninja (talk) 18:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I was about to bring up this issue. Most sources I've looked at, including match reports and TV news segments, the goal is credited to Alan. But then I did some more research and most news articles credit it to Armando. So I watched the MLS replays of the goal, but that didn't help since the announcers just said Pulido and there were no names on the backs of the jerseys. So then I watched replays on YouTube and the announcer clearly said Armando. Confused I was, so I continued to search. I looked at Armando's goals against Fire and the guy looked to be the same Pulido. So the question we should answer is: which sources are more reliable: the match reports, the news articles or the videos? Personally, I think we should leave it as Alan until the competition resumes. Hopefully by then, the confusion will be resolved. MxcnKing926 (talk) 02:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is Armando Pulido who scored the first goal. If you look at the jersey number in the Chivas game it is 18, the same as Armando Pulido who scored 2 against the Fire. They also changed it on the ESPN article to Armando and not Alan. I'm going to go ahead and change it on the article since this is pretty definitively Armando who scored all 3 goals (They also have 3 goals on the stat sheet article on the superliga sight: http://web.superliga2009.com/stats/) and it's been awhile since this debacle started.Sloclops (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on 2009 North American SuperLiga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2009 North American SuperLiga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009223002/http://web.mlsnet.com/news/mls_news.jsp?ymd=20070402&content_id=87043&vkey=pr_mls&fext=.jsp to http://web.mlsnet.com/news/mls_news.jsp?ymd=20070402&content_id=87043&vkey=pr_mls&fext=.jsp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.mlsnet.com/news/mls_news.jsp?ymd=20081121&content_id=205863&vkey=pr_mls&fext=.jsp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.mlsnet.com/scoreboard/game.jsp?match=06212009_SANNE

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic