Talk:2008 NRL season results

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

NRL season results

edit

I'm against the inclusion of non-NRL match results in an article titled 2008 NRL season results. If this article were titled '2008 Australian rugby league season results' it would be fine, but it's not. An article titled '2008 NRL season results' should contain results of NRL matches only. Notes with links to Origin and Test matches will be sufficient. Origin series articles do not list NRL fixture results. I think everyone can agree that this article is long enough without including information that belongs elsewhere. Remember, NRL does not equal rugby league (just as NFL does not equal American Football, AFL does not equal Australian Rules Football, etc., etc.).--Jeff79 (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Maybe put them in the See Also section. SOO is obviously not part of the NRL, but the distinction isn't particularly meaningful in this context, IMO
You're right. It is obvious. That's my point. I say put a note linking to the relevant article where they're already mentioned now, but not list any match information. But they can appear in the See also section too I suppose. In addition, they'll also be listed in the 2008 in rugby league category to which this article belongs, so anyone who wants non-NRL match details will hardly have any trouble finding them.--Jeff79 (talk) 05:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


"The Sharks have ended Parramatta's clean run" and "slipping North Queensland to their long held position." If you're going to editorialise, at least try and use less murky phrasing.

Manly is winning

edit

Should we list Manly as 1st in the top 8 part now to save time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.12.51 (talk) 10:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Popping a brief mention under the round in which it became certain would be fine I think.--Jeff79 (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Round 22

edit

Was the Bulldogs/Cowboys game really played at Suncorp Stadium?--Jeff79 (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes. An "away" home game. Silly. Florrieleave a note 12:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
So it was played there? I didn't know anything about it. Thought it might be a mistake. Could a note be put in about it to prevent any future readers' confusion (and potential for changing)?--Jeff79 (talk) 12:54, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Manly qualified for the GrandFinal as the Home team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.178.216 (talk) 12:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

Discussion centralised here.--Jeff79 (talk) 04:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 NRL season results. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply