Talk:1 gigametre

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Merge to Orders of magnitude (length), 4 July 2016, see discussion.
No Consensus, 13 January 2013, see discussion.
Procedural Close, 12 January 2013, see discussion.
Keep, 18 March 2008, see discussion.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement

Lists Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

layout

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the layout is really confusing: the heading "shorter than distance X" if followed by a list of entries that are greater than X, which makes no sense.

Besides, I don't see why each order of magnitude needs a separate article (and talk page - for example, this comment is probably not going to get appropriate attention on this page, since the problem is common to the related pages, but i couldn't guess where the more appropriate place would be). Why not make all these pages just be subsections of one article, "orders of magnitude (length)"?. Cesiumfrog (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dead link

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.braincampaign.org/Pub/Pub_Main_Display.asp?LC_Docs_ID=2769
- In 1 gigametre on 2011-06-09 12:30:18, HTTP Redirect Loop: [1] -> [2] -> [3] -> [4]
- In 1 gigametre on 2011-06-20 03:35:39, HTTP Redirect Loop: [5] -> [6] -> [7] -> [8]

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic