Talk:1996–97 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season

Systems:

• M1 - Named Rhonda by BoM - MFR ATCR Pg 68
• M2 - Tropical Depression - MFR ATCR Pg 68 onwards

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1996–97 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "There were 12 named storms, beginning with Antoinette and proceeding sequentially until Lisette. " link to Lisette's article? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Sure! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "The first named storm, Antoinette, was the first of several to originate in the neighboring Australian basin, or east of 90º E; the subsequent two named storms both formed in the Australian region from the intertropical convergence zone. " The from the ITCZ part is kinda weird, and Im not sure if its needed for the lead. Do you mind canning it? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• It's fine, I can cut it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "After reaching peak 10–minute winds of 185 km/h (115 mph)" for a lead, is this needed? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes, only because Daniella was tied for the strongest storm of the season. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
• "There was a total of 100 days on which disturbances, depressions, storms, or cyclones were active, compared to the average of 68." did this set any records or come close to any (i.e. largest since XXXX). YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Source didn't say so, but I doubt it. 93-94 was way more active. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
• "Despite the long season, there was minimal activity from March to May, despite that time period usually representing about 25% of total activity. " "despite that time" sounds bad. Revise this to "even though this time period usually represented"

• I tweaked. See if you like. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "A tropical low formed on" what's "a tropical low"? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Linked. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "Meanwhile, the JTWC estimated peak 1–minute winds of 230 km/h (145 mph)." move this sentence to the one after you mention how rare it was to be an ITC. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Yea, I was considering that, thanks. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "(115 mph 10–minute) and 220 km/h (140 mph 1–minute)" why is it the 10/1 min thing small letters here but not anything else? :P YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• I redid that sentence. I wanted to combine the peak intensities into one thought, but it works better with a bit more spacing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "Gretelle made landfall on southeastern Madagascar near Farafangana,[1][16] the first cyclone to hit the region in 41 years.[17] " add a "becoming" before "the". YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Why? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "with 152 confirmed fatalities by twp weeks after the storm,[23] " "twp" when did you turn into YE? :P YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Gah! That was the one section I didn't do on my computer. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "Due to a powerful ridge near Île Amsterdam" is that on Jupiter? link please? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Huh, thought I had! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• ". Late on January 24, the system developed into a tropical depression, by which time Mauritius Meteorological Service" according to TAM here, it is "Mauritius Meteorological Services". Also, add a "the" after "time". YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• It's there now, and fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• When researching Lisette, I noticed that Josie affected Mozambique. Why isn't this mentioned? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• I'm not actually sure I buy that. I didn't see any sources of Josie affecting Mozambique while the storm was active, only from Lisette looking back. 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• "the JTWC and MFR estimated respective peak intensities of 85 km/h (50 mph 1–minute sustained) and 55 km/h (35 mph 10–minute sustained)" why the small font for the 10 min/1 min bit? You don't do anywhere else sans here and Grettle's section? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Again, it was because I wanted to indicate the peaks in one sentence. Since I changed the other one, I'll do this one too. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• Why is the external links section blank? YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 03:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

• I never looked down there. I just removed it, nothing additional would go there anyway. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1996–97 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080811021537/http://www.em-dat.net/ to http://www.em-dat.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)