Talk:1946 Florida hurricane

Latest comment: 8 years ago by FrontsInFront in topic Actually hurricane six?
Good article1946 Florida hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 17, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:1946 Florida hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, this is a nice, concise article. I only found one little copy editing change to do.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   Clear, concise wording
    B. MoS compliance:   Complies with the required MoS elements
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:   Reliable sources
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   Well referenced
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:   Sets the context
    B. Focused:   Remains focused on the subject
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!  

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 19:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Actually hurricane six?

edit

According to the season page, this would actually be Hurricane Six, not Five, as indicated by the infobox. I'm fixing, if anybody sees a conflict between these two, or can confirm this was an error, please notify me. FrontsInFront (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply