Talk:1946 Florida hurricane
Latest comment: 8 years ago by FrontsInFront in topic Actually hurricane six?
1946 Florida hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:1946 Florida hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, this is a nice, concise article. I only found one little copy editing change to do.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality: Clear, concise wording
- B. MoS compliance: Complies with the required MoS elements
- A. Prose quality: Clear, concise wording
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources: Reliable sources
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- B. Focused: Remains focused on the subject
- A. Major aspects: Sets the context
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 19:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Actually hurricane six?
editAccording to the season page, this would actually be Hurricane Six, not Five, as indicated by the infobox. I'm fixing, if anybody sees a conflict between these two, or can confirm this was an error, please notify me. FrontsInFront (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)