Talk:1921–22 Cardiff City F.C. season

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Kosack in topic GA Review
Featured article1921–22 Cardiff City F.C. season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 26, 2022.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 19, 2019Good article nomineeListed
July 30, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 26, 2019.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during Cardiff City F.C.'s 1921–22 season, trainer George Latham became the oldest player in club history when called into action after members of the first team fell ill?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1921–22 Cardiff City F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 10:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

edit
edit

Prose

edit

Lede

edit

Background and preseason

edit
A levee made of earth, only used here for supporters to stand on rather than to direct water. Kosack (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

First Division

edit
  • The game therefore became the first top tier match in English football to be played in Wales - therefore is a bit weird to me. Just because there wasn't Welsh clubs, doesn't mean it wasn't possible for matches to have been held in Wales previously. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 17:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think its reasonable to assume that as the first Welsh club to reach that level, the match would consequently be the first to be held in Wales. In the 100-year history of the Football League, I don't believe an English club has ever played a home match outside the country. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
During the era, The Times simply listed "our football correspondent" as the author of the articles. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the record still stands and is for all competitions. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Cup matches

edit

Player details

edit
The record books I have only state Cardiff's goalscorers, so I'm unsure of that I'm afraid. Kosack (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notes & References

edit

GA Review

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit
Thanks for the review Lee, I'll sort out these issues asap. Kosack (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Lee Vilenski: Done up to the point you have reached, cheers. Kosack (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply