Talk:1920 APFA season

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2603:6000:AA4D:C5B8:0:3361:EAF8:97B7 in topic "Divisional" records in error
Good article1920 APFA season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 26, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
March 21, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Chicago vs Racine Cardinals

edit

I understand that the Cardinals were called Racine (after the street in Chicago) during the 1920 and 21 seasons.Smith03 (talk) 17:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Divisional" records in error

edit

Listed: Racine Cardinals (3-2-2), Columbus Panhandles (0-4-0); tabulated from the game list: Racine Street (Chicago) Cardinals (3-2-1), Columbus Panhandles (0-5-0). The "divisional" point scores are, 95-7 for Akron, 67-14 for Decatur, 74-19 for Buffalo, 34-26 for Racine Street, 98-35 for Rock Island, 127-47 for Dayton, 6-17 for Rochester, 72-44 for Canton, 6-61 for Detroit, 14-46 for Cleveland, 22-63 for Chicago (Tigers), 7-98 for Hammond, 7-107 for Columbus and 0-45 for Muncie. I'll let someone else tabulate the end-of-season division-only won-loss-tied streaks and whether to add the divisional total point scores. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6000:AA4D:C5B8:0:3361:EAF8:97B7 (talk) 02:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 1920 APFA season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply