Talk:1912–13 United States Senate elections

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Wehwalt in topic Some error I think
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States Senate elections, 1912 and 1913. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

This Article is Really Obtuse

edit

This article has at the start "32 of the 96 seats in the United States Senate (as well as special elections) 49 seats needed for a majority." What on earth does 32 mean here? The article should start out with a clear summary of this election, like:

"The Senate Election of 1912-13 resulted in Democrats having ___ seats, Republicans having ___ seats, Party X having ___ seats, Party Y having ___ seats, but ___ vacant seats. The reasons why there were ___ vacant seats are [blah blah]." The reason why this election is not simply the election of 1912 is [blah blah]." The composition of the Senate before the next election changed with the passage of time as follows: [blah blah]."

It is hard to see the forest from the trees in this article. (PeacePeace (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC))Reply

  • That info you quote was not in the lede, but rather from the Infobox, a data-gathering summary box designed just to give data without a narrative. However, I've added some info to the lede narrative paragraph which I hope will make the article less obtuse. Tell me what you think about it. Thanks for bringing this up. —GoldRingChip 16:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Some error I think

edit

There's something wrong with the percentage of the vote for George A. Steele in the Nevada election. The percentage is copied from the previous line, I think. Wehwalt (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply