Talk:190 (number)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Piotrus in topic "198 (number)" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 198 (number) was merged into 190 (number) with this edit on 10 March 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Debate on whether this page is the most dumbest Wikipedia page or not
editThis is one of the most dumbest wiki pages that exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.107.80.245 (talk) 05:09, 2007 September 28 (UTC)
Most dumbest? Before criticising, TAKE GRAMMAR LESSONS!
☻I am only here because the Vulcans want to know when they should come☻ (talk) 14:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- The Vulcans wouldn't need this page because they'd already know this information and would probably meditate on far larger numbers than us mere humans could hope to deal with. PrimeFan (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
"198 (number)" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 198 (number) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 29#198 (number) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)