Talk:1843

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.

If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:07, 6 May 2004 (UTC)(talk)Reply

June 6

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

added * June 6 - In Barbados, Samuel Jackman Prescod, is the first non-white person - Date added (see Prescod page for ref) .... he wasn't black... he was classified as non-white. Others use the phrase the first of african descent ... but I'll let others decide.

You already had the fact, but no date. Victuallers (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seriously big wagon train error from 5/16

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A factoid of this article made the front page on Wikipedia today. Too bad there is a glaring error. These kinds of errors are what gives Wikipedia a bad name. :( The factoid states

"1843 – The first major wagon train heading for the Pacific Northwest set out on the Oregon Trail (reenactment pictured) with a thousand pioneers from Elm Grove, Missouri."

I'm not here to debate the "major" part, but where it says "a thousand pioneers" has just GOT to be wrong. The Oregon Trail (OT) article claims a significantly lower number as

"... with more than 100 pioneers."

I don't know how to change things on the front page, but I really hope we don't see this as trivia now at other sites because they read it here. I may x-post (yes, that's bad but hopefully someone can fix it today or now) this to the OT page. MagnoliaSouth ^(talk) 15:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic