Talk:152 mm SpGH DANA

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Nickolas Ryan in topic Timeline inconsistency between pages

Untitled

edit

There are some POV problems with the first paragraph, and it's nowhere noted what country originally designed it - necessary for statements like the first sentence of the development history. Also, in regards to the first sentence, certainly the Soviet [I]SU-152 was earlier - is the development wheels instead of treads? This should be emphasized. I wouldn't know enough, however, to go about researching this. TitoLeibowitz 02:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the POV thing, perhaps 'shocked' isn't appropriate here, and I've added who originally designed and built it, and while hte Soviet ISU-152 was the first Self propelled artillery gun, it was tracked, not wheeled, so yes, I will try to emphasize it more.

Verdafolio

I've changed the country of origin from Czech Republic to Czechoslovakia, since Czech Republic started to exist only in 1993, after the division of Czechoslovakia.

Wakko

It was designed in Slovakia, as far as I know. --Ondrejsv (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Czechoslovakia's defense industry structure was anything but atomic. While it may have been assembled in Slovakia, parts of any sophisticated equipment were produced and designed all over the country. Ihosama (talk) 11:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:152mm SpGH Dana model 77.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:152mm SpGH Dana model 77.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 152mm SpGH DANA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Map and figures update

edit

FYI, these are now in operation in Ukraine, if someone can update the map Yellowmellow45 (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Timeline inconsistency between pages

edit

Here, and most outside sources agree that DANA is based on the T815 chassis, first produced 1983; the T815 page also mentions this fact. However, DANA was designed 1976, and produced 1980, so this does not add up. Additionally, the T813 (predecessor to the T815) page states that DANA is based on it aswell, so what is it? It is clearly based on the Tatra heavy vehicles, that much is clear, but the "how so" of it is not. Nickolas Ryan (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply