Requested move

edit
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move DrKiernan (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

May I raise a question about the name of this? I accept that we sometimes need to use names invented after the event to distinguish (say) the modern Indian Army from the Indian Army (1895–1947) of British India, or in this case the Baloch Regiment of the old Indian Army from the Baloch Regiment of the Pakistan Army, but couldn't we use the more authentic name here of Baluch Regiment (Indian Army)? Regards, Xn4 (talk) 13:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Having copyedited the text heavily, it's now clear that its just the 10th Baluch Regiment covered, so disambiguation is not needed, there only being one of these. I'll shift it along soon enough, assuming I don't need admin help.GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
It does actually need admin help, if you have no objections, I'll request the move.GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
You're right, 10th Baluch Regiment is even better. And I think perhaps Baluch Regiment should be a dab page instead of a redirect. Xn4 (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lt Gen HR Briggs, CB, DSO & Bar, Colonel of 2-10 Baluch 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Lt Gen HR Briggs, CB, DSO & Bar, Colonel of 2-10 Baluch 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply