 | This page was proposed for deletion by EoRdE6 (talk · contribs) on 18 November 2014 with the comment: Entirely unsourced, could be completely fake... Needs sourcing or removal It was seconded by Bearian (talk · contribs) on 19 November 2014 with the comment: Cannot be verified, is possibly a hoax It was contested by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) on 20 November 2014 with the comment: citation added |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 20 November 2014. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Sources
editOne good-quality source was found simply by checking what links here. I have therefore declined the proposed deletion. However, I have tagged the page for more sources. – Fayenatic London 17:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- As EoRdE6 still thinks this is "badly sourced, possibly hoax" (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ǃXu (god)), I have added more.
- The Bushman dictionary is by Dorothea F. Bleek; a scanned text copy is at the Internet Archive here. Her good authority as a reliable source is confirmed by the bibliography here: Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics, p. 16, at Google Books. ISBN 9780864862808. – Fayenatic London 20:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm not trying to hate on the topic, I just want to be sure that this article is correct. Lots of people rely on wiki for information and we need to insure that it is correct... EoRdE6 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Cheers! Thanks for the speedy close. At least the page is better sourced now. – Fayenatic London 08:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm not trying to hate on the topic, I just want to be sure that this article is correct. Lots of people rely on wiki for information and we need to insure that it is correct... EoRdE6 (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)