In quantum information theory, quantum relative entropy is a measure of distinguishability between two quantum states. It is the quantum mechanical analog of relative entropy.
Motivation
editFor simplicity, it will be assumed that all objects in the article are finite-dimensional.
We first discuss the classical case. Suppose the probabilities of a finite sequence of events is given by the probability distribution P = {p1...pn}, but somehow we mistakenly assumed it to be Q = {q1...qn}. For instance, we can mistake an unfair coin for a fair one. According to this erroneous assumption, our uncertainty about the j-th event, or equivalently, the amount of information provided after observing the j-th event, is
The (assumed) average uncertainty of all possible events is then
On the other hand, the Shannon entropy of the probability distribution p, defined by
is the real amount of uncertainty before observation. Therefore the difference between these two quantities
is a measure of the distinguishability of the two probability distributions p and q. This is precisely the classical relative entropy, or Kullback–Leibler divergence:
Note
- In the definitions above, the convention that 0·log 0 = 0 is assumed, since . Intuitively, one would expect that an event of zero probability to contribute nothing towards entropy.
- The relative entropy is not a metric. For example, it is not symmetric. The uncertainty discrepancy in mistaking a fair coin to be unfair is not the same as the opposite situation.
Definition
editAs with many other objects in quantum information theory, quantum relative entropy is defined by extending the classical definition from probability distributions to density matrices. Let ρ be a density matrix. The von Neumann entropy of ρ, which is the quantum mechanical analog of the Shannon entropy, is given by
For two density matrices ρ and σ, the quantum relative entropy of ρ with respect to σ is defined by
We see that, when the states are classically related, i.e. ρσ = σρ, the definition coincides with the classical case, in the sense that if and with and (because and commute, they are simultaneously diagonalizable), then is just the ordinary Kullback-Leibler divergence of the probability vector with respect to the probability vector .
Non-finite (divergent) relative entropy
editIn general, the support of a matrix M is the orthogonal complement of its kernel, i.e. . When considering the quantum relative entropy, we assume the convention that −s · log 0 = ∞ for any s > 0. This leads to the definition that
when
This can be interpreted in the following way. Informally, the quantum relative entropy is a measure of our ability to distinguish two quantum states where larger values indicate states that are more different. Being orthogonal represents the most different quantum states can be. This is reflected by non-finite quantum relative entropy for orthogonal quantum states. Following the argument given in the Motivation section, if we erroneously assume the state has support in , this is an error impossible to recover from.
However, one should be careful not to conclude that the divergence of the quantum relative entropy implies that the states and are orthogonal or even very different by other measures. Specifically, can diverge when and differ by a vanishingly small amount as measured by some norm. For example, let have the diagonal representation
with for and for where is an orthonormal set. The kernel of is the space spanned by the set . Next let
for a small positive number . As has support (namely the state ) in the kernel of , is divergent even though the trace norm of the difference is . This means that difference between and as measured by the trace norm is vanishingly small as even though is divergent (i.e. infinite). This property of the quantum relative entropy represents a serious shortcoming if not treated with care.
Non-negativity of relative entropy
editCorresponding classical statement
editFor the classical Kullback–Leibler divergence, it can be shown that
and the equality holds if and only if P = Q. Colloquially, this means that the uncertainty calculated using erroneous assumptions is always greater than the real amount of uncertainty.
To show the inequality, we rewrite
Notice that log is a concave function. Therefore -log is convex. Applying Jensen's inequality, we obtain
Jensen's inequality also states that equality holds if and only if, for all i, qi = (Σqj) pi, i.e. p = q.
The result
editKlein's inequality states that the quantum relative entropy
is non-negative in general. It is zero if and only if ρ = σ.
Proof
Let ρ and σ have spectral decompositions
So
Direct calculation gives
where Pi j = |vi*wj|2.
Since the matrix (Pi j)i j is a doubly stochastic matrix and -log is a convex function, the above expression is
Define ri = Σjqj Pi j. Then {ri} is a probability distribution. From the non-negativity of classical relative entropy, we have
The second part of the claim follows from the fact that, since -log is strictly convex, equality is achieved in
if and only if (Pi j) is a permutation matrix, which implies ρ = σ, after a suitable labeling of the eigenvectors {vi} and {wi}.
The relative entropy is jointly convex. For and states we have
The relative entropy decreases monotonically under completely positive trace preserving (CPTP) operations on density matrices,
.
This inequality is called Monotonicity of quantum relative entropy and was first proved by Lindblad.
An entanglement measure
editLet a composite quantum system have state space
and ρ be a density matrix acting on H.
The relative entropy of entanglement of ρ is defined by
where the minimum is taken over the family of separable states. A physical interpretation of the quantity is the optimal distinguishability of the state ρ from separable states.
Clearly, when ρ is not entangled
by Klein's inequality.
Relation to other quantum information quantities
editOne reason the quantum relative entropy is useful is that several other important quantum information quantities are special cases of it. Often, theorems are stated in terms of the quantum relative entropy, which lead to immediate corollaries concerning the other quantities. Below, we list some of these relations.
Let ρAB be the joint state of a bipartite system with subsystem A of dimension nA and B of dimension nB. Let ρA, ρB be the respective reduced states, and IA, IB the respective identities. The maximally mixed states are IA/nA and IB/nB. Then it is possible to show with direct computation that
where I(A:B) is the quantum mutual information and S(B|A) is the quantum conditional entropy.
References
edit- Vedral, V. (8 March 2002). "The role of relative entropy in quantum information theory". Reviews of Modern Physics. 74 (1). American Physical Society (APS): 197–234. arXiv:quant-ph/0102094. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74..197V. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.197. ISSN 0034-6861. S2CID 6370982.
- Michael A. Nielsen, Isaac L. Chuang, "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information"
- Marco Tomamichel, "Quantum Information Processing with Finite Resources -- Mathematical Foundations". arXiv:1504.00233