This page is part of WikiProject Current events, an attempt to expand and better organize information in articles related to current events. If you would like to participate in the project, visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.Current eventsWikipedia:WikiProject Current eventsTemplate:WikiProject Current eventsCurrent events
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This page is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Before reinsertion, the following section needs a better source. Furthermore, it needs simplification, because it consists of too long sentences where I frankly lose orientation somewhere by the second to third clause of each sentence. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
In an unexpected turn of events, an Alba Iulia appeals court definitely decides that the offence of abuse in office (official misconduct) is de jure decriminalized by the fact that a previous June 2016 decision by the Constitutional Court, which stated that the abuse in office is unconstitutional due to unclear definition subject to various interpretations, was not put in accordance with the fundamental law by the former government. Thus, the current government's emergency ordinance, which clarified the situation but started massive street protests, fueled by the opposition parties and the president of Romania, was, in fact, necessary in reinstating the repudiated offence. (stiripesurse.ro)[better source needed][clarification needed]
