People v. Unger, Supreme Court of Illinois, 362 N.E. 2d 319 (1977),[1][2] is a criminal case that distinguished between necessity and duress.[3] Prisoner Unger escaped under a claim of threat of physical violence, was recaptured, and was not allowed to use a defense of necessity or defense of duress.[3]
| People v. Unger | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Supreme Court of Illinois |
| Full case name | The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Francis Unger, Appellee. |
| Decided | April 5, 1977 |
| Citations | 362 N.E. 2d 319; 66 Ill. 2d 333 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Robert C. Underwood, Daniel P. Ward, Howard C. Ryan, Joseph H. Goldenhersh, William G. Clark, James A. Dooley, Thomas J. Moran |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Ryan |
| Concurrence | Ward, Goldenhersh, Clark, Dooley, Moran |
| Dissent | Underwood |
| Keywords | |
References
edit- ^ Justia
- ^ Case Brief
- ^ a b Criminal Law - Cases and Materials, 7th ed. 2012, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business; John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, Guyora Binder, ISBN 978-1-4548-0698-1, [1]