The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to "free white person(s) ... of good character". This eliminated ambiguity on how to treat newcomers, given that free black people had been allowed citizenship at the state level in many states. In reading the Naturalization Act, the courts also associated whiteness with Christianity and thus excluded Muslim immigrants from citizenship until the decision Ex Parte Mohriez recognized citizenship for a Saudi Muslim man in 1944.[5]
.svg) | |
| Other short titles | Naturalization Act |
|---|---|
| Long title | An Act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization. |
| Enacted by | the 1st United States Congress |
| Effective | March 26, 1790 |
| Citations | |
| Public law | Pub. L. 1–3 |
| Statutes at Large | 1 Stat. 103, chap. 3 |
| Legislative history | |
| |
| Major amendments | |
| Naturalization Act of 1795 | |
Congress modeled the act on the Plantation Act 1740 of the British Parliament (13 Geo. 2 c.7) that was officially titled An Act for Naturalizing such foreign Protestants and others therein mentioned, as are settled or shall settle in any of His Majesty's Colonies in America, and used its provisions concerning time, oath of allegiance, the process of swearing before a judge, etc.[6][7]
Provisions
editThere was a two-year residency requirement in the United States and one year in the state of residence before an alien would apply for citizenship by filing a Petition for Naturalization with "any common law court of record" having jurisdiction over his residence. Once convinced of the applicant's "good character", the court would administer an oath of allegiance to support the Constitution of the United States. The applicant's children to the age of 21 would also be naturalized. The court clerk was to record these proceedings, and "thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States".
The act also provided that children born abroad when both parents are US citizens "shall be considered as natural born citizens", but specified that the right of citizenship did "not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States".[8][9][10] This act was the only US statute ever to use the term "natural born citizen", found in the US Constitution concerning the prerequisites for a person to serve as president or vice president, and the Naturalization Act of 1795 removed the term.
Though the act did not specifically preclude women from citizenship, courts absorbed the common law practice of coverture into the United States legal system.[11] Under this practice, the physical body of a married woman, and thus any rights to her person or property, was controlled by her husband. A woman's loyalty to her husband was considered above her obligation to the state.[12] Jurisprudence on domestic relations held that infants, enslaved people, and women should be excluded from participation in public life and conducting business because they lacked discernment, the right to free will and property, and there was a need to prevent moral depravity and conflicts of loyalty.[13][14]
Afterward
editThe Naturalization Act of 1795 repealed and superseded the 1790 Act. The 1795 Act extended the residence requirement to five years and required that a prospective applicant give notice of three years of application. The Naturalization Act of 1798 extended the residency requirement to 14 years and the notice period to five years. The Naturalization Law of 1802 repealed the 1798 Act, restoring the residency and notice requirements of the 1795 Act.
With the adoption of the Naturalization Law of 1804, women's access to citizenship was increasingly tied to their state of marriage. By the end of the 19th century, the overriding consideration to determine a woman's citizenship or ability to naturalize was her marital status. Starting in 1907, a woman's nationality entirely depended on whether she was married.[15]
The Treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek, which the US Congress ratified in 1831, allowed those Choctaw Indians who chose to remain in Mississippi to gain recognition as US citizens, the first major non-European ethnic group to become entitled to US citizenship.
Congress made significant changes in citizenship in the 19th century following the American Civil War. The Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 granted citizenship to people born within the United States and subject to its jurisdiction, irrespective of race, but it excluded untaxed "Indians" (Native Americans living on reservations). The Naturalization Act of 1870 extended "the naturalization laws" to "aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent" while also revoking the citizenship of naturalized Chinese Americans.[16]
Under the Fourteenth Amendment and despite the 1870 Act, the Supreme Court in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) recognized US birthright citizenship of an American-born child of Chinese parents who had a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and who were there carrying on business, and were not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China.[17] US citizenship of persons born in the United States since Wong Kim Ark have been recognized, although the Supreme Court has never directly made a ruling concerning children born to parents who are not legal residents in the United States.
Native Americans were granted citizenship in a piecemeal manner until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, which gave them blanket citizenship whether they belonged to a federally recognized tribe, though by that date, two-thirds of Native Americans had already become US citizens by other means. The Act was not retroactive, so it did not cover citizens born before the effective date of the 1924 Act or outside of the United States as an indigenous person.
Further changes to racial eligibility for citizenship by naturalization were made after 1940 when Congress extended eligibility to "descendants of races indigenous to the Western Hemisphere", "Filipino persons or persons of Filipino descent", "Chinese persons or persons of Chinese descent", and "persons of races indigenous to India".[18] The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 prohibits racial and sex discrimination in naturalization.[19]
References
edit- ^ "Annals of Congress, House of Representatives, 1st Cong., 2nd sess". Library of Congress. 1790. p. 1463. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
- ^ "Annals of Congress, Senate, 1st Cong., 2nd sess". Library of Congress. 1790. p. 992. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
- ^ "House Journal. 1790. 1st Cong., 2nd sess". Library of Congress. p. 178. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
- ^ "Senate Journal. 1790. 1st Cong., 2nd sess". Library of Congress. p. 124. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
- ^ Beydoun, Khaled A. (August 18, 2016). "America banned Muslims long before Donald Trump". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Lemay, Michael; Barkan, Elliott Robert (1999). "U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues: A Documentary History". pp. 6–9. Archived from the original on August 5, 2020.
- ^ "Historical Timeline – Immigration – ProCon.org". Immigration. Retrieved November 25, 2022.
- ^ Hymowitz, Carol; Weissman, Michaele (1975). A History of Women in America. Bantam. ISBN 9780072878134.
- ^ Schultz, Jeffrey D. (2002). Encyclopedia of Minorities in American Politics: African Americans and Asian Americans. Oryx Press. p. 284. ISBN 9781573561488. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
- ^ Bad news for Ted Cruz: his eligibility for president is going to court Dara Lind and Jeff Stein. Vox Media. February 18, 2016. Retrieved February 20, 2016.
- ^ Kerber 1998, p. 11.
- ^ Kerber 1998, p. xxiii.
- ^ Isenberg 1998, p. 45.
- ^ Jefferson 1999, pp. 219–220.
- ^ Smith, Marian L. (Summer 1998). ""Any woman who is now or may hereafter be married...": Women and Naturalization, ca. 1802–1940". Prologue Magazine. 30 (2). Washington, D.C.: United States National Archives and Records Administration. ISSN 0033-1031. Archived from the original on April 29, 2020. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
- ^ Forbidden Citizens: Chinese Exclusion and the U.S. Congress: A Legislative History. The Capitol Net. ISBN 9781587332524.
- ^ United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
- ^ Coulson, Doug (2015). "British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. Thind Revisited". Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives (7): 2. SSRN 2610266.
- ^ Daniels, Roger. Coming to America, A History of Immigration and Ethnicity in American Life.
Bibliography
edit- Isenberg, Nancy (1998). Sex and Citizenship in Antebellum America. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-4746-6.
- Jefferson, Thomas (1999). Appleby, Joyce; Ball, Terence (eds.). Jefferson: Political Writings. Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-64841-7.
- Kerber, Linda K. (1998). No Constitutional Right to be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship (1st ed.). New York, New York: Hill and Wang. ISBN 0-8090-7383-8.