Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property is a 2003 documentary film about Nat Turner co-written and directed by Charles Burnett.
| Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Charles Burnett |
| Written by |
|
| Produced by | Frank Christopher |
| Cinematography | John Demps |
| Edited by |
|
| Music by | Todd Capps |
Release date |
|
Running time | 57 minutes |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
Cast
editThe documentary interweaves Thomas R. Gray's 1831 The Confessions of Nat Turner, William Styron's 1966 novel of the same name, and additional source material by Harriet Beecher Stowe, William Wells Brown, and Randolph Edmonds.
Cast
editDifferent actors played Nat Turner, depending on the source material.[1]
- Nat Turner
- Carl Lumbly (Gray)
- Tommy Hicks (Edmonds)
- James Opher (Styron)
- Michael LeMelle (Brown)
- Patrick Waller (Stowe)
Tom Nowicki played Thomas R. Gray, and Billy Dye played Young Nat Turner.[1]
Release
editThe documentary was first shown as a "work in progress" at the Full Frame Documentary Film Festival in 2002 and was subsequently edited to be 26 minutes shorter.[1] The documentary screened at multiple film festivals throughout 2003 and aired on PBS the following year.[2]
Critical reception
editScott Foundas of Variety said the documentary was "insightful, if somewhat foreshortened", finding better the "work in progress" version shared in 2002 that was 26 minutes longer. Foundas said, "While this re-edit is an improvement over the original in other respects — the cutting is more fluid, the narration has been re-recorded and the archival material... has been three-dimensionally embossed... it seems, overall, a more timid, less confrontational movie."[1]
Jonathan Rosenbaum, writing for the Chicago Reader, called the documentary "brilliant" and described Burnett's goal: "Interviewing two dozen historians and theorists, half of them black, Burnett treats all their interpretations, many of which he dramatizes, as equally credible—a radical but plausible approach given how little is known about Turner. He's most interested in charting how the interpretations were arrived at and why those of white and black commentators often differ."[3]
Richard Brody, writing for The New Yorker in "Sixty-two Films That Shaped the Art of Documentary Filmmaking," said "One of the great fiction filmmakers, (Charles) Burnett here deploys his dramatic artistry along with a historian's ardor and a journalist's probing interviews. The film is a work of cinematic historiography, examining how Turner's life, and the rebellion he led, have been depicted and deformed over time. Burnett dramatizes historical events through a multiplicity of performances, and offers a glimpse at his own effort to film them."[4]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c d Foundas, Scott (4 March 2003). "Review: 'Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property'". Variety. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
- ^ Obenson, Tambay A. (21 August 2013). "Nat Turner's Slave Rebellion Happened Today - Past And Future Films On The Historical Event". Shadow and Act. IndieWire. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
- ^ Rosenbaum, Jonathan. "Nat Turner: A Troublesome Property". Chicago Reader. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
- ^ "Sixty-two of the Best Documentaries of All Time". The New Yorker. 2020-10-14. Archived from the original on 2023-05-22.
Further reading
edit- Hodgkins, John (2013). "Inventing Nat Turner: Charles Burnett and the Postmodern History Film". The Drift: Affect, Adaptation, and New Perspectives on Fidelity. Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 105–136. ISBN 978-1-62356-070-6.
- Peary, Gerald (2011). "Set This House on Fire: Nat Turner's Second Coming". In Kapsis, Robert E. (ed.). Charles Burnett: Interviews. Conversations with Filmmakers Series. University Press of Mississippi. pp. 126–129. ISBN 978-1-60473-949-7.