Houston v. State, 583 S.W.2d 267 (1980), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Tennessee that held that "repeated shots or blows" was sufficient circumstantial evidence to prove premeditation and deliberation for first degree murder.[1]
Houston v. State | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of Tennessee |
Full case name | Richard Houston, Appellant, v. State of Tennessee, Appellee. |
Decided | January 7, 1980 |
Citation | 583 S.W.2d 267 |
Case history | |
Appealed from | Knox County Criminal Court |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | William J. Harbison, William Fones, John C. Cooper, Joe W. Henry, John K. Byers[a] |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Cooper, joined by Fones, Harbison, Byers |
Dissent | Henry |
Keywords | |
Subsequent history
editHouston was overruled by the case State v. Brown, which required more evidence than repeated blows to show deliberation.[2]
Notes
edit- ^ Special Justice
References
editExternal links
editText of Houston v. State (1980) is available from: Google Scholar Justia