Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq

Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq (2006) is a book by Washington Post Pentagon correspondent Thomas E. Ricks. Fiasco deals with the history of the Iraq War from the planning phase to combat operations in 2006 and argues that the war was badly planned and executed. Ricks based the book in part on interviews with military personnel involved in the planning and execution of the war. In 2009, Ricks published a sequel The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006–2008. Fiasco was a finalist for the 2007 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction.[1]

Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq
First edition
AuthorThomas E. Ricks
LanguageEnglish
SubjectIraq War
PublisherPenguin Group
Publication date
2006
Publication placeUnited States
ISBN1-59420-103-X
OCLC67375172
956.7044/3 22
LC ClassDS79.76 .R535 2006

Summary

edit

The book alleges that the planning of the Iraq war was mismanaged by both the Bush administration as well as the U.S. Army. Ricks then goes on to outline the infighting between the senior policy advisers such as Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and the Army. Ricks includes quotes from former generals of the Iraq war, former Army generals, and several top level officials, both working for the Bush administration and Douglas Feith's planning contingent. Moving into the war, Ricks alleges various miscommunication and mismanagement of the Army's combat tactics as well as criticizing the overall strategy. Ricks also heavily criticizes the actions of L. Paul Bremer and explores his impact as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority.

References

edit
  1. ^ "The Pulitzer Prizes | Finalists". Pulitzer.org. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
edit