Submission declined on 28 September 2024 by Ktkvtsh (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 16 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bonadea 2 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 12 December 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 11 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 7 August 2023 by AngusWOOF (talk). We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer. Declined by AngusWOOF 15 months ago. |
- Comment: Although I'm a reviewer myself, I'm not reviewing this because I don't review things I submit or create. Also I'm not experienced at reviewing. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: See WP:MEDIUM for an explanation for why Medium should not be used as a source. bonadea contributions talk 10:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Rush E is a piece of music composed for piano by YouTube creator Sheet Music Boss. Written in the key of A minor,[1][2] the piece was developed to be intentionally difficult, if not impossible, to be played by a single human pianist.[2] The song was developed as an extension of the "E" internet meme, itself a derivative of the "Lord Marquaad" meme in which the face of YouTube creator Markiplier is superimposed over the body of Shrek character Lord Farquaad.[2]
Composition
editThe piece is noted to have Russian classical music influences. It consists of over 30,000 individual notes, as well of hundreds of chords including upward of 30 different individual notes. A vocal overlay with a deep-echoed "E" can be observed partly through the first half of the piece.
References
edit- ^ "How To Play Rush E On The Piano – Mozart Project". www.mozartproject.org. 2022-09-15. Retrieved 2024-09-17.
- ^ a b c Noona, Sangah (2023-09-01). "Professional Pianist Learns "Rush E" By Ear | Pianote". The Note. Retrieved 2024-09-17.