| Submission declined on 21 August 2024 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 19 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CFA 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Unfortunately, I can only find two references that could potentially be used for notability and they are both local from the same area. Would need additional significant coverage in order to show WP:GNG. CNMall41 (talk) 01:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The first two sources are primary, the only secondary source (SMDP) is a local-interest story. Per WP:GNG, we need to see significant coverage in multiple secondary sources. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
| Danial Asaria | |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Born | November 4, 2001 |
| Title | International Master (2020) |
| Peak rating | 2347 (December 2017) |
Danial Asaria is an American chess International Master (2020). He is one of five players in history to have won the National Elementary, Junior High School, and High School championships.[1]
Chess career
editIn 2018 Danial Asaria was the co-champion of the American Open.[2]
In 2020 Danial Asaria won the North American Junior Chess Championship.[3][4]
Danial Asaria defeated his first grandmaster at the age of 15.[5]
Danial Asaria founded the Asaria School of Chess, where he has taught over 500 students, ranging from CEOs and hedge fund managers to underprivileged youth.[6]
References
editExternal links
edit- Danial Asaria rating card at FIDE
- Danial Asaria player profile at Chess.com's Global Top Player List
  | This biographical article relating to an American chess figure is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |