Cranberry fruit rot (CFR) is a disease complex of multiple fungal agents affecting the American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon). Cranberry fruit rot can be categorized into field rot (rot occurring while growing and before harvest) and storage rot (occurring any time after harvest).[1] The importance of field rot and fruit rot depends on how the cranberries will be processed after harvest. If cranberries are immediately processed after harvest, growers focus on preventing field rot while with fresh market cranberries, growers seek to prevent storage rot.[1] There are 10-15 fungal pathogens known to cause cranberry fruit rot diseases, some active in only field rot, storage rot, or both.[2] The majority of these fungal pathogens are ascomycetes, with the rest being deuteromycetes.[2] There is no known bacterial pathogen that plays a role in CFR or any major disease on cranberry, potentially due to the low pH conditions on the cranberry fruit.[3]
Host and symptoms
editIn cranberries, the fruit rot pathogens can infect before or after harvest. The symptoms of a rot are related to a general softening and deterioration of the cranberry, which occur both in the field and in storage.[1] Each specific rot disease that make up the CFR disease complex are caused by specific pathogens (Table 1). An example is the field rot cotton ball caused by Monilinia oxycocci, common in Wisconsin, while bitter rot caused by Glomerella cingulate occurs generally in Massachusetts.[4] However, these pathogens have been shown to not be entirely specific to their areas.[5] These symptoms can often resemble other forms of fruit deterioration such as sunscald, hail damage, and temporal physiological breakdown.[1]
| Disease | Fungus | Field Rot | Storage Rot |
|---|---|---|---|
| bitter rot | Colletotrichum acutatum | X | |
| cottonball rot | Monilinia oxycocci | X | |
| early rot | Phyllosticta vaccinii | X | |
| berry speckle | Phyllosticta elongata | X | X |
| blotch rot | Physalospora vaccinii | X | X |
| end rot | Fusicoccum putrefaciens | X | X |
| ripe rot | Coleophoma empetr | X | X |
| viscid rot | Phomopsis vaccinii | X | X |
| yellow rot | Botrytis sp. | X | X |
| black rot | Allantophomopsis lycopodina | X |
Disease cycles
editDue to the complexity and number of fungal pathogens involved in CFR, the specific disease cycles have yet to be fully studied. Researchers believe almost every fruit rot pathogen completes a disease cycle every 1–3 years.[2] Researchers however have hypothesized 3 potential disease cycles taken by the pathogens.[1] These 3 disease cycles rely heavily on leaves or stems, either debris or living, mainly because all berries are harvested.[1]
- Type 1. Fungal inoculum overwinters in plant debris in the soil surface. In the spring, the fungi produce fruiting bodies and infect developing plants. The main infection occurs when flowers bloom and during the early parts of fruit development.
- Type 2. Fungi persist in living leaves then infect as the plant develops fruit while leaves drop.
- Type 3. Fungal inoculum overwinter in plant debris and infect during cranberry harvest. When the floodwater is released during harvest, spores are dispersed and infect through potential wounds from equipment.
Management
editThe management of CFR can be complicated and varies due to the number of pathogens and the temporal aspect of fruit rot. Fungicides applied during the projected times of infection and on potential areas, such as flowers and after fruit set, are effective at deterring fruit rot. Due to the number of pathogens, general fungicides such as chlorothalonil, instead of specific-targeting fungicides, are more effective.[2] However, fungicides can reduce fruit quality and fruit set in some cases, thus their use is often limited.[2] Harvest can also play a role in reducing the risk of pathogens. Wet harvest using floodwater, although quicker and easier, can spread pathogens, which would increase chances of storage rot.[6] Dry harvests can cause more damage to vines and take longer, but can reduce disease spread and decrease the potential of storage rot.[6] Depending on the final use of cranberries, each harvest type can be beneficial. Sanding, a process where sand is laid on the field to stimulate root growth from the harvested cranberries, could actually play a role in covering up inoculum with plant debris, which may decrease the chances of field and storage rot.[2] Resistance and biological controls have proved difficult to validate due to the disease complex being composed of different fungal pathogens.[2]
References
edit- ^ a b c d e f g McManus, P. Cranberry fruit rot diseases in Wisconsin. 4 (2001).
- ^ a b c d e f g Oudemans, Peter V.; Caruso, Frank L.; Stretch, Allan W. (1998). "Cranberry Fruit Rot in the Northeast: A Complex Disease". Plant Disease. 82 (11): 1176–1184. doi:10.1094/pdis.1998.82.11.1176. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30845403.
- ^ Polashock, James J.; Caruso, Frank L.; Averill, Anne L.; Schilder, Annemiek C., eds. (2017). Compendium of Blueberry, Cranberry, and Lingonberry Diseases and Pests, Second Edition. The American Phytopathological Society. doi:10.1094/9780890545386. ISBN 978-0-89054-538-6.
- ^ Olatinwo, R. O.; Hanson, E. J.; Schilder, A. M. C. (2003). "A First Assessment of the Cranberry Fruit Rot Complex in Michigan". Plant Disease. 87 (5): 550–556. doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.5.550. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30812957.
- ^ McManus, P. S. (March 1998). "First Report of Early Rot of Cranberry Caused by Phyllosticta vaccinii in Wisconsin". Plant Disease. 82 (3): 350. doi:10.1094/pdis.1998.82.3.350a. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30856872.
- ^ a b McManus, P. S.; Caldwell, R. W.; Voland, R. P.; Best, V. M.; Clayton, M. K. (2003). "Evaluation of Sampling Strategies for Determining Incidence of Cranberry Fruit Rot and Fruit Rot Fungi". Plant Disease. 87 (5): 585–590. doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.5.585. ISSN 0191-2917. PMID 30812963.