Wikipedia

Cervical effacement

Cervical effacement or cervical ripening refers to the thinning and shortening of the cervix. This process occurs during labor to prepare the cervix for dilation to allow the fetus to pass through the vagina. While this is a normal, physiological process that occurs at the later end of pregnancy, it can also be induced through medications and procedures.[2]

The cervix is located in the lower part of the uterus and connects the uterine cavity to the vagina. The cervix consists of two parts; the upper part lies in the pelvic/abdominal cavity and the lower part is intravaginal. [1]

During gestation, the cervix maintains pregnancy by increasing synthesis of various proteins. These proteins have defined interactions that allow the formation of matrix proteins to help fortify the uterine cervix.[3] Toward the end of pregnancy, a series of hormone-mediated biochemical process takes place to degrade the collagen and fiber network to cause the cervix to ripen during labor. Failure to ripen the cervix during labor may delay its onset and cause complications.[4] Current efforts to induce labor include pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic, mechanical and surgical methods.

Cervical ripening has primarily been performed in the inpatient setting. Due to a variety of reasons, such as cost and patient preference, the capacity to undergo outpatient cervical ripening is being explored.[5]

Mechanism

edit

Physiological

edit

Prior to effacement, the cervix is like a long bottleneck, usually about four centimeters in length. Throughout pregnancy, the cervix is tightly closed and protected by a plug of mucus. Effacement is accompanied by cervical dilation. When the cervix effaces, the mucus plug is loosened and passes out of the vagina. The mucus may be tinged with blood and the passage of the mucus plug is called bloody show (or simply "show"). As effacement takes place, the cervix then shortens, or effaces, pulling up into the uterus and becoming part of the lower uterine wall.

 
Diagram showing an outline of the changes occurring during cervical ripening

Histological and biochemical

edit

Further Information: Signaling Pathways Regulating Human Cervical Ripening in Preterm and Term Delivery[6]

Histologically, the cervix undergoes significant changes towards the end of gestation, allowing the ripening of cervix for the passage of birth delivery. First, there is an increase in the cervical synthesis of glycosaminoglycan hyaluronan (HA), which increases tissue hydration, thereby catalyzing the degradation of collagen and elastin-fibers. Second, there is an increase in the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases that also act to digest components of the extracellular matrix, including proteoglycans, laminin, and fibronectin, which are found in the cervical stroma (parametrium).[7] Third, due to the nature of the cervical effacement process, enzymes and other mediators that regulate allergic and inflammatory responses are also involved.[6] One of the immunomodulating factors, mast cells, is known to secrete inflammatory mediators that modulate the process of cervical ripening through mast cell degranulation.[8] Histamine, one of the allergenic mediators released by mast cells, has shown to have causative relationship with cervical smooth muscle contractility. However, the research is not complete.[6]

Assessment and measurement

edit
 
Digital pelvic exam is used to measure the width of the opening of the cervix.[9]

Bishop score

edit

The Bishop score is the most common method of assessing the need for induction of labor. The scoring is based on a digital cervical exam and takes into consideration cervical dilation, position, effacement, consistency of the cervix and fetal station. [10]

  • Cervical dilation measures how dilated the cervix is in centimeters
  • Position refers to the position of the cervix relative to the fetal head and pelvis [10]
  • Effacement assesses the thinning and shortening of the cervix in comparison to the whole cervix length
  • Consistency of the cervix refers to the firmness of the cervix
  • Fetal station is the position of the fetal head relative to the pelvis

Cervical dilation, effacement and station are scored from 0 to 3. Cervical consistency and position are scored from 0 to 2. The total score ranges with a minimum of 0 and maximum of 13. A Bishop score of 6 and below indicates that induction is not favorable and no method of induction will be highly effective. In these cases, cervical ripening agents may be used. A score of 8 and above indicates induction of labor is favorable and the possibility of a vaginal delivery with induction will be similar to spontaneous labor. [10]

Cervical effacement is an important component of the Bishop score and is reported as a percentage. 0% indicates the cervix is at normal length, 50% indicates the cervix is half of the expected length and 100% effaced means the cervix is paper thin. [10]

The Bishop score has been modified in current medical practice. The modified scoring method takes into consideration only 3 parameters: dilation, effacement, and fetal station. These are scored between the range of 0 to 3 each with a score of 5 or above being favorable for induction of labor. [10]

Other methods

edit

Given that cervical effacement is measured as a percentage, this method requires a consensus on a standard uneffaced cervix length. However, this can vary among physicians. This requirement presents itself as an opportunity for error, miscommunication and inappropriate care in the process of assessing cervical effacement. Other methods used in assessing and measuring cervical effacement may be more accurate than the Bishop score, such as the metric system of measuring the cervix. Integrating the metric system of measurement of the cervix may reduce and eliminate the risk of error and assumptions on cervical length. [11]

Imaging methods are also being considered to measure cervical effacement. Elastography measures the stiffness and ability of soft tissue and can be used to assess how the cervical tissue deforms under pressure. This cannot be assessed manually and can be a useful parameter in predicting a preterm or full term delivery. There are two methods of elastography. Static elastography measures the tissue displacement in response to manual compression or movement. Dynamic elastography measures speed of shear wave propagation. [12] Both methods can provide useful information on the stiffness of the cervix in considering induction of labor.

Contra-indications

edit

Cervical ripening is contraindicated in pregnancies presenting with the following conditions:[13]

Contraindications to cervical ripening also include those of vaginal birth.[15] Absolute contraindications can result in life-threatening events, and relative contraindications should be considered with caution. The absolute and relative contraindications to vaginal birth include, but are not limited to the following:

Absolute contraindications:[15]

Relative contraindications:[15]

Risks and complications

edit

Labor induction poses different risks to the woman and fetus. As such, risks and complications relating to cervical effacement can be classified as being a risk to the woman or the fetus.

Risk to woman

edit

Infection

edit

Cervical ripening via transcervical balloon catheter can increase the risk of infection to the woman. Approximately 11% of pregnancies develop an intrapartum infection, 3% a postpartum infection and 5% a neonatal infection. Only intrapartum infection was deemed a clinically significant risk. [16]

Uterine hyperstimulation

edit

The risk of uterine hyperstimulation as it relates to labor induction is higher with dinoprostone and vaginally administered misoprostol than it is with oxytocin and mechanical methods.[17]

Fetal risks

edit

Autism

edit

Oxytocin dysregulation has been linked to Autism or autism spectrum disorder. As oxytocin is one of the methods used for cervical ripening, the Committee on Obstetric Practice at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists conducted a review of existing research regarding this link, and concluded that there was insufficient evidence of a causal link between cervical effacement via oxytocin and autism/ASD. [18]

Fetal distress or hyperstimulation

edit

Low dose oral misoprostol for the purpose of labor induction, is associated with a lower risk of fetal distress than vaginally administered misoprostol. [19]

Vaginally administered dinoprostone is associated with an increased risk of fetal hyperstimulation with or without fetal heart rate abnormalities. [17]

Cervical ripening in the outpatient setting and the inpatient setting

edit

Inpatient and outpatient cervical ripening done via vaginally administered dinoprostone or balloon catheters in low risk pregnancies do not have different rates of caesarean section.[2] Cervical ripening using dinoprostone vaginal inserts have the same rates of neonatal morbidity, caesarean section, and labor onset when used in the outpatient setting and the inpatient setting.[20]

Methods

edit

Pharmacologic

edit

Oxytocin is one of the most commonly used medications for cervical effacement. It is given as an infusion to either start or increase uterine contractions. Epidurals are often used together for pain. Oxytocin may also be used in the setting of amniotomy as well as balloon catheters to further contractions in conjunction to these procedures.

Misoprostol is a medication that can cause contractions for cervical effacement. When used with balloon catheters, vaginal delivery was more likely to occur within the next 24 hours after initiation. It is known as a type of prostaglandin and available worldwide. It can also be used for early termination of pregnancy.

Also in the class of prostaglandins, dinoprostone increases contractions. It is available in both gel and vaginal insert form and while both are safe and efficacious, one study has found that in those with a bishop score of less than or equal to 4, the vaginal insert seemed to be more effective in spontaneous vaginal delivery by about 20%.

Non-pharmacologic

edit

Red raspberry leaf tea is an herbal option for cervical effacement. In a retrospective observational study conducted in 1999, while there was not significant difference in time for second and third stage of labour, the "mean time in first stage of labour is also substantially lower in the raspberry leaf group". The data, however, was not proven to be statistically significant.

Warm bath is a common method used by midwives to ease labor pain and also induce labor. In a study conducted in 2019, "cervical dilation increased in all groups (p<.001), as well as the number of uterine contractions increased, mainly in the group that used combined bath and ball and also showed shorter labor time". Safety precautions should be taken to make sure that the water temperature is not too high as it can lead to fetal distress.

Mechanical

edit

Balloon Catheters are catheters that can be inserted into the cervix in the setting of pregnancy to induce labor. Saline is used to inflate the balloon, causing increased pressure to the cervix. This is to imitate the pressure of a fetal head that would be pressing on the cervix during labor, which in turn speeds up the process.

Hygroscopic dilator is a dilator that is inserted into the cervix and expands in size as it absorbs genital tract moisture. They can also be used for early termination of pregnancy.

According to a study conducted in Japan from 2012-2014, the rate of delivery at term seemed to be equivalent between the group that used balloon catheter and that of the hygroscopic dilator.[26]

Surgical

edit

Amniotomy is a procedure where a hook is inserted into the amniotic membranes to puncture, causing the amniotic fluid to drain from the amniotic sac that holds the fetus. The reason for the surgical procedure could either be for cervical effacement or to look at fetal status as a device can be inserted into the amniotic sac for monitoring. The sign of successful procedure is when the amniotic fluid immediately comes out once the membrane is punctured. Certain amniotic fluid colors can indicate fetal distress, which is why it is important for the obstetrician or midwife to check the color.

Membrane stripping, otherwise known as membrane sweeping, is a procedure where the obstetrician inserts a finger into the cervix and moves in a sweeping motion to detach the amniotic membrane from the uterus. It is thought to be different from other procedures in that it is less costly compared to the other. While it may be an inexpensive procedure, it comes with its own risks. Membrane sweeping may rupture the amniotic sac for 1 out of 10 women who get this procedure done, which will then lead for the need to formally induce labor within 24 hours. Membrane sweeping can also be very painful and can cause bleeding and irregular contractions. Membrane sweeping is also not effective for 7 out of the 8 women that get this procedure done.

References

edit
  1. ^ Prendiville W, Sankaranarayanan R (2017). "Anatomy of the uterine cervix and the transformation zone". Colposcopy and Treatment of Cervical Precancer. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  2. ^ a b McDonagh M, Skelly AC, Tilden E, Brodt ED, Dana T, Hart E, et al. (2021). "Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 137 (6): 1091–1101. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004382. PMC 8011513. PMID 33752219.
  3. ^ Winkler M, Rath W (1999). "Changes in the cervical extracellular matrix during pregnancy and parturition". Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 27 (1): 45–60. doi:10.1515/JPM.1999.006. PMID 10343934. S2CID 25915432.
  4. ^ Hayashi RH (1993). "Spontaneous and induced cervical ripening. Natural dilation and effacement process and current cervical ripening techniques". The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 38 (1 Suppl): 66–72. PMID 8429529.
  5. ^ McDonagh M, Skelly AC, Hermesch A, et al. Cervical Ripening in the Outpatient Setting [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Mar. (Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 238.) Introduction. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK569286/
  6. ^ a b c Socha MW, Flis W, Pietrus M, Wartęga M, Stankiewicz M (2022). "Signaling Pathways Regulating Human Cervical Ripening in Preterm and Term Delivery". Cells. 11 (22): 3690. doi:10.3390/cells11223690. PMC 9688647. PMID 36429118.
  7. ^ Nagase, Hideaki; Woessner, J. Frederick (1999). "Matrix Metalloproteinases". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 274 (31): 21491–21494. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.31.21491. PMID 10419448.
  8. ^ Elieh Ali Komi, Daniel; Wöhrl, Stefan; Bielory, Leonard (2020). "Mast Cell Biology at Molecular Level: a Comprehensive Review". Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. 58 (3): 342–365. doi:10.1007/s12016-019-08769-2. ISSN 1080-0549. PMID 31828527. S2CID 209312232.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Evbuomwan O, Chowdhury YS (2023). "Physiology, Cervical Dilation". StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. PMID 32491514. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  10. ^ a b c d e Wormer KC, Bauer A, Williford AE (2023). "Bishop Score". StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. PMID 29261961. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  11. ^ Holcomb WL, Smeltzer JS (1991). "Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 78 (1): 43–45. PMID 2047066.
  12. ^ Swiatkowska-Freund M, Preis K (2017). "Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives". International Journal of Women's Health. 9: 245–254. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S106321. PMC 5407449. PMID 28461768.
  13. ^ a b c d e Wheeler V, Hoffman A, Bybel M (2022). "Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor". American Family Physician. 105 (2): 177–186. PMID 35166491.
  14. ^ American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2019). "Avoidance of Nonmedically Indicated Early-Term Deliveries and Associated Neonatal Morbidities Committee Opinion No. 765". Obstet Gynecol. 133 (2): e156–e163. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003076. PMID 30681546. S2CID 59251667. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  15. ^ a b c Desai NM, Tsukerman A (2023). "Vaginal Delivery". StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. PMID 32644623. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  16. ^ Gommers JS, Diederen M, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol BW (November 2017). "Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review". European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 218: 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.014. PMID 28963922.
  17. ^ a b Mozurkewich, Ellen L; Chilimigras, Julie L; Berman, Deborah R; Perni, Uma C; Romero, Vivian C; King, Valerie J; Keeton, Kristie L (2011). "Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review". BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 11 (1): 84. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-84. ISSN 1471-2393. PMC 3224350. PMID 22032440.
  18. ^ "Labor Induction or Augmentation and Autism". www.acog.org. 2014. Retrieved 2023-07-31.
  19. ^ Kerr RS, Kumar N, Williams MJ, Cuthbert A, Aflaifel N, Haas DM, Weeks AD, et al. (Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group) (2021). "Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021 (6): CD014484. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD014484. PMC 8218159. PMID 34155622.
  20. ^ Mazzoli I, O'Malley D (2022). "Outpatient versus inpatient cervical ripening with a slow-release dinoprostone vaginal insert in term pregnancies on maternal, neonatal, and birth outcomes: A systematic review". Birth. 50 (3): 473–485. doi:10.1111/birt.12687. PMID 36332128. S2CID 253350933.
  21. ^ "Oxytocin Drug Information". UpToDate. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  22. ^ McDonagh, Marian; Skelly, Andrea C.; Hermesch, Amy; Tilden, Ellen; Brodt, Erika D.; Dana, Tracy; Ramirez, Shaun; Fu, Rochelle; Kantner, Shelby N. (2021-03-22). Cervical Ripening in the Outpatient Setting (Report). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). doi:10.23970/ahrqepccer238.
  23. ^ Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T (2010). "A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 89 (5): 651–657. doi:10.3109/00016340903575998. PMID 20199360. S2CID 28283910.
  24. ^ Parsons M, Simpson M, Ponton T (1999). "Raspberry leaf and its effect on labour: safety and efficacy". Australian College of Midwives Incorporated Journal. 12 (3): 20–25. doi:10.1016/s1031-170x(99)80008-7. PMID 10754818.
  25. ^ Cavalcanti AC, Henrique AJ, Brasil CM, Gabrielloni MC, Barbieri M (2019). "Complementary therapies in labor: randomized clinical trial". Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem. 40: e20190026. doi:10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20190026. PMID 31553374. S2CID 202815594.
  26. ^ a b Shindo R, Aoki S, Yonemoto N, Yamamoto Y, Kasai J, Kasai M, Miyagi E (2017). Hawkins SM (ed.). "Hygroscopic dilators vs balloon catheter ripening of the cervix for induction of labor in nulliparous women at term: Retrospective study". PLOS ONE. 12 (12): e0189665. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1289665S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189665. PMC 5741218. PMID 29272277.
  27. ^ "Dilapan-S® | Next Day Cervical Ripening". www.dilapans.com. Retrieved 2023-07-27.
  28. ^ Mahdy, Heba; Glowacki, Christopher; Eruo, Frederick U. (2023), "Amniotomy", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID 29261890, retrieved 2023-08-04
  29. ^ Finucane, Elaine M; Murphy, Deirdre J; Biesty, Linda M; Gyte, Gillian ML; Cotter, Amanda M; Ryan, Ethel M; Boulvain, Michel; Devane, Declan (2020-02-27). Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group (ed.). "Membrane sweeping for induction of labour". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020 (2): CD000451. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3. PMC 7044809. PMID 32103497.
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Cervical_effacement&oldid=1242097330"