Category talk:Catholic Church and science
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Chicbyaccident in topic Opposed speedy renaming
 | This category was nominated for renaming on 13 March 2018. The result of the discussion was rename. |
Opposed speedy renaming
edit
Moved from WP:CFDSThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Category:Roman Catholicism and science to Category:Catholic Church and science – Per WP:Consistency with main article. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose speedy. Head article moved to its current location today by the nom,[1] so WP:C2D is not applicable. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:01, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Stale: @Chicbyaccident No comments in 7 days, so this discussion is now stale, and I am going to remove it. It can of course be proposed as a full CfD discussion. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Not sure if you made a mistake. It seems you deleted notices related to the new proposals at categories for merge rather than speedies. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Chicbyaccident: pls show WP:DIFFs of where you think I got it wrong. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Reverted the edits in question instead. Let me know if I misunderstood you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Chicbyaccident: Diffs would help a lot more than vague waves, but the reverts notified me, so I see now what happened. You had opened full CfD discussions and removed the speedy tags, but didn't post anything at WP:CFDS to notify that you had opened full discussions. So I was using my script to removing all CfD tags, and didn't check for a full CfD tag because you hadn't had the courtesy to notify WP:CFDS that you had abandoned that process ... and you left those discussions live while the discussion had moved elsewhere. Not a good approach to consensus-forming.
--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:57, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Alright, sorry, wasn't sure about the procedure. Thanks for helping. Chicbyaccident (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Chicbyaccident: Diffs would help a lot more than vague waves, but the reverts notified me, so I see now what happened. You had opened full CfD discussions and removed the speedy tags, but didn't post anything at WP:CFDS to notify that you had opened full discussions. So I was using my script to removing all CfD tags, and didn't check for a full CfD tag because you hadn't had the courtesy to notify WP:CFDS that you had abandoned that process ... and you left those discussions live while the discussion had moved elsewhere. Not a good approach to consensus-forming.
- @BrownHairedGirl: Reverted the edits in question instead. Let me know if I misunderstood you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Chicbyaccident: pls show WP:DIFFs of where you think I got it wrong. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Not sure if you made a mistake. It seems you deleted notices related to the new proposals at categories for merge rather than speedies. Chicbyaccident (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.