Birmingham Northern Beltline

Interstate 422 (I-422), Corridor X-1, or the Birmingham Northern Beltline is a proposed 52.5-mile-long (84.5 km) northern bypass route around Birmingham, Alabama, through northern and western Jefferson County that is projected to be completed by 2047.[2] Along with the existing I-459, the Northern Beltline would complete the bypass loop of central Birmingham for all Interstate traffic. The project's budget is $5.445 billion; upon completion, the Northern Beltline will be the most expensive road in Alabama's history, and among the most expensive per mile ever built in the United States.[2] The route was first conceived in the 1960s, but funding issues and pushback from environmental activists have stalled the project for decades with only a short, unused segment being constructed in the mid-2010s. A 10-mile-long (16 km) section between Gardendale and Pinson was funded in spring 2023, but the start of construction was delayed by another complaint before construction on the initial unused segment resumed in Summer 2024.

Future Interstate 422 marker
Future Interstate 422
Corridor X-1
Map
Proposed Birmingham Northern Beltline corridor highlighted in red
Route information
Auxiliary route of I-22
Maintained by ALDOT
Length52.5 mi[1] (84.5 km)
Major junctions
South end I-20 / I-59 / I-459 / US 11 south of Bessemer
Major intersections
North end US 11 near Argo
Location
CountryUnited States
StateAlabama
CountiesJefferson
Highway system
  • Alabama State Highway System
US 411I-422 US 431
SR 759 SR 1

Current plans for the route have it connecting to I-59 at I-459's current southern terminus in Bessemer, at approximately milemarker 147 to the northeast of Trussville, near Argo. Additional studies are underway to determine the economic feasibility to continue the route from its proposed northeastern terminus southward to I-20 in the LeedsMoody area in western St. Clair county.

The route has been designated as the Appalachian Regional Commission's high-priority Corridor X-1, unsigned State Route 959 (SR 959), and I-422. The 422 numbering does not conform to normal Interstate guidelines, since it only crosses its "parent" route I-22 in the middle (and will connect only via I-222), while bypass and loop routes are usually numbered by the route connected to at or near each end, which would result in the use of a route number such as "I-659".

History

edit

As early as the 1960s, the prospect of a complete beltway encircling Birmingham was envisioned. Although the proposal was initially dropped from the original Interstate Highway System, the completion of Birmingham's outer beltway has been speculated since the completion of I-459 in 1985. By 1989, the first federal and local funds were earmarked for a project to study the feasibility of constructing the route.[citation needed]

In September 1993, the Birmingham Metropolitan Planning Organization made a $500,000 request from the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) for preliminary engineering of the beltline. Through the continued efforts of representative Spencer Bachus, in June 1995, the project was designated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) as part of the National Highway System. As a result of this designation, the beltline would be eligible for federal transportation funding.[citation needed]

In 1997, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reviewed a number of potential routes for the Birmingham Northern Beltline. They submitted comments on September 8, 1997, and recommended ALDOT select a shorter, 30-mile (48 km) route due to its smaller environmental impact. They also firmly recommended against the longest route, citing that the route would "disrupt streams at 14 crossings, impact over 4050 acres [1,640 ha] forested lands within the ROW, and will destroy up to 68 acres [28 ha] of wetlands at 114 different sites. It will also have the greatest impact on wildlife of all the alignments discussed".[3] This is the route that ALDOT eventually selected for the Northern Beltline.

In 2000, the Northern Beltline was added to the area’s Transportation Plan, and, in 2001, Senator Richard Shelby and Congressman Spencer Bachus secured $60 million to buy right of-way and do preliminary engineering for the route. In 2003, Shelby secured an additional $2 million for the continued purchasing of right-of-way. Progress continued with the purchasing of additional right-of-way through the county as of 2006.[citation needed] In May 2009, Bachus announced in the Birmingham News that the Northern Beltline had been designated as I-422.[4][5]

Construction started on a 1.34-mile (2.16 km) section north of Pinson on February 24, 2014, which will connect State Route 79 (SR 79) near White Oaks to SR 75 near Palmerdale.[6] This section is budgeted to cost $46 million and was expected to be completed by fall 2016.[7] However, it was held up by local opposition and a lack of funding forced the project to be put on hold in fall 2016. Construction was expected to resume in 2019, but this did not happen.[8] On April 12, 2023, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey announced on April 12, 2023 that $489 million in federal funding had been secured to resume construction that spring. The funding will cover five years for construction of the original segment along with an extension westward beyond SR 79 to US 31 for a total of 10 miles (16 km). However, construction of this segment of the interstate, which will be four lanes,[9] was delayed again and ALDOT did not expect to break ground on the resumption of the project until November 2023.[10] There were no new announcements made on the project[11] until late-June 2024, when ALDOT announced that they had finally resumed construction on the initial phase between SR 75 and SR 79 in late-June 2024; this phase is expected to be completed in late-2026.[12] The FHA now estimates that the construction of the interstate in its entirety will cost $5.44 billion (an average of over $100 million per mile of road); the original estimate was $3.4 billion.[2]

I-65, I-59, and I-459 in the Birmingham metro are expected to be widened or reconstructed to accommodate the increase in traffic that will come from the construction of I-422.[13][14]

Controversy

edit

The construction of the Northern Beltline has significant opposition from local communities and local conservation groups. Environmental groups filed lawsuits in 2011 and 2013 to block construction of the beltline in federal court. The groups cited the project's environmental and economic impact in their filing. The groups' request for preliminary injunction to stop construction was blocked in January 2014.[15] The Northern Beltline is to cross Black Warrior and Cahaba river tributaries in 90 places, including two major sources of drinking water, and could affect 35 wetland areas once constructed. Some groups, such as OCHS, claim that the Beltline could increase traffic congestion on I-59.[16] In late-June 2023, the Southern Environmental Law Center filed a complaint to ALDOT on the project on behalf of the Black Warrior Riverkeeper. The complaint said the project will impact Birmingham’s drinking water and that the money being spent on this project could be used in better ways across the state claiming that the northern beltline project has been ranked one of the seven worst projects in terms of wasting taxpayer money.[17] Recent polling has shown that 74% of Birmingham civic and business leaders support the project, but only 54% of the respondents believe that ADOT can complete it by 2050.[18] Recent planning reports from ALDOT indicate that construction on some segments may not begin until 2070.[19]

The 52-mile-long (84 km) project was budgeted to cost $5.445 billion, making it the most expensive road project in Alabama history. At $104.7 million per mile ($65.1 million per kilometer), this budget also makes the Northern Beltline one of the most expensive roads per mile built in the US.[2] This cost does not include the cost of extending sewer services, powerlines, and other needed infrastructure where beltline is to be constructed.[16] In 2010, a study estimated 69,535 jobs could be created by the beltline.[1] A later study projected that 2,805 jobs could be added in the area by 2048.[16]

Exit list

edit

The entire route is in Jefferson County.

LocationmikmExitDestinationsNotes
Bessemer0A-B 
 
I-459 north
   I-20 / I-59 – Birmingham, Tuscaloosa, Meridian
Proposed southern terminus; southern terminus of I-459
McAdory4  CR 36 (Johns Road)Proposed interchanges
Hueytown515th Street Road / Virginia Drive
7  CR 46 (Warrior River Road)
Sylvan Springs9  SR 269 (Birmingport Road)
Graysville12   US 78 / SR 5 (Adamsville Parkway)
Brookside13 
 
 
 
I-222 south to I-22
Mount Olive14  CR 112 (Brookside Mt. Olive Road)
16  CR 77 (New Found Road)
17  CR 112 (Mt. Olive Road)
18A-B  I-65 – Birmingham, Montgomery, Huntsville, Decatur
19  US 31 (Decatur Highway / SR 3) – Morris, GardendaleFuture interchanges (funded, to be completed by 2032)[9]
21  CR 129 (Glenwood Road)
22  CR 121 (New Castle Road)
Pinson23  CR 151 (Narrows Road) – Pinson
25  SR 79 (New Bradford Highway)Future interchanges (funded, to be completed by 2027)[12]
26  SR 75 – Pinson
Clay28  CR 30 (Old Springville Road) – ClayProposed interchanges
30A-B  I-59 – Birmingham, Gadsden
30C   US 11 / SR 7 – GadsdenProposed northern terminus
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi
  •       Unopened

References

edit
  1. ^ a b http://northernbeltline.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/finalreport.pdf[permanent dead link]
  2. ^ a b c d "Welcome to FOIS". Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
  3. ^ "Birmingham Northern Beltline Final Environmental Impact Statement" (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. September 8, 1997.
  4. ^ MacDonald, Ginny (May 26, 2009). "Corridor X/ I-65 interchange construction could begin this year". The Birmingham News. Archived from the original on June 20, 2009. Retrieved January 25, 2020.
  5. ^ Gray, Jeremy (June 28, 2010). "I-422 to infuse billions in Birmingham area". al. Retrieved May 12, 2023.
  6. ^ Smith, Mike D. "Northern Beltline construction scheduled to begin Monday (updated)". Al.com, February 19, 2014.
  7. ^ "Northern Beltline's first segment under way for $46 million; efforts to keep Self Creek clean (photos, video)". AL.com. February 28, 2014. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
  8. ^ Edgemon, Erin (November 8, 2017). "Birmingham Northern Beltline loses federal funding". al. Retrieved May 12, 2023.
  9. ^ a b "Gov. Kay Ivey: Construction will resume soon on Northern Beltline". MSN. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
  10. ^ Blakely, Will (August 24, 2023). "U.S. Rep. Palmer: Northern Beltline 'critical' for Alabama; Says I-65…". 1819 News. Retrieved August 25, 2023.
  11. ^ Blakely, Will (December 30, 2023). "Birmingham in 2023: This year's top stories in Alabama's largest…". 1819 News. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  12. ^ a b Watson, Nathan (July 1, 2024). "ALDOT begins first phase of Birmingham Northern Beltline construction | Bham Now". bhamnow.com. Retrieved July 6, 2024.Douglas, Patsy (July 2, 2024). "Work resumes on the Northern Beltline highway". WVTM. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
  13. ^ Turner, Alyssa (August 31, 2023). "Governor Ivey Announces Widening of I-65, Hoover Interchange Project and Widening of I-59". Office of the Governor of Alabama. Retrieved September 5, 2023.
  14. ^ Anderson, Jon (January 14, 2024). "Wilkins, McFeeters challenge Palmer in Congressional District 6 forum". HooverSun.com. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
  15. ^ "Northern Beltline: Federal judge denies request for a preliminary injunction to block construction (updated)". AL.com. January 18, 2014. Retrieved October 5, 2014.
  16. ^ a b c Chilton, Dr. Ken; Meyer, Dr. Peter (June 2012). If You Build It, Will They Come? (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on December 7, 2013. Retrieved August 12, 2014.
  17. ^ McQueen, Madie (June 27, 2023). "Environmentalists file complaint against ALDOT Birmingham Northern Beltline project". CBS 42. Retrieved June 30, 2023.
  18. ^ Poor, Jeff (July 29, 2023). "Poll shows support for Birmingham's Northern Beltline, but little…". 1819 News. Retrieved August 4, 2023.
  19. ^ https://cpmsapps.dot.state.al.us/OfficeEngineer/ProjectReports/RuralRpts/Rural37.pdf [bare URL PDF]
edit
KML is not from Wikidata